/prog/ - Google bad — Tinychan BBS

Name: Anonymous 2020-03-04 10:36

G**gle bad, free software good

https://www.matsuko.ca/blog/stop-using-material-design-text-fields/

Name: Anonymous 2020-03-04 10:41

no lies detected

Name: Anonymous 2020-03-04 11:22

Google has always been stunningly bad at UX for no reason at all. GUI design in proprietary software peaked with Windows 95, and I mean that sincerely. Flat design is a disaster.

Name: Конец Гуглю 2020-03-04 13:19

>>3

Google has always been stunningly bad at UX for no reason at all.

http://gotai.net/forum/default.aspx?postid=294249

ИИ не только база данных.

http://ai.neocities.org/InFerence.html

Name: Anonymous 2020-03-04 16:35

>>4

gotai

hello, mentishit

what does your shrink say?

Name: Anonymous 2020-03-04 17:01

I prefer Windows NT gui. It is the best interface every invented by humanity. Clean and simple, yet works well with human brain by employing 3d forms.

Name: Anonymous 2020-03-04 18:20

>>6
NT never had a distinct shell. It just used what the equivalent home version used.

Name: Anonymous 2020-03-05 1:59

>>6
Nah, CDE was better and it worked on both Unix and VMS.

Name: Anonymous 2020-03-05 2:38

Mac OS 8.1 was the pinnacle of GUIs. Windows 95 is lol-tier.

Name: Anonymous 2020-03-05 13:17

>>9
The disconnected menu bar is objectively bad UX. Win95 was a shit OS, but its shell was a genuinely incredible combination of intuitive discoverability and high-speed usability for experienced users. It's criminally underrated because we all had our brains rotted by '90s anti-Microsoft memes.

Name: Anonymous 2020-03-06 2:39

>>10
Windows' keyboard navigability in particular is highly underrated. Mac OS has never been half as good, and Linux is balls as usual.

Name: !L33tUKZj5I 2020-03-06 2:49

>>11
If I could roll a win 7 desktop with Linux kernel/programs I would in a heartbeat.

Name: !L33tUKZj5I 2020-03-06 2:50

Classic shell only of course.

Google bad

1 Name: Anonymous 2020-03-04 10:36

2 Name: Anonymous 2020-03-04 10:41

3 Name: Anonymous 2020-03-04 11:22

4 Name: Конец Гуглю 2020-03-04 13:19

5 Name: Anonymous 2020-03-04 16:35

6 Name: Anonymous 2020-03-04 17:01

7 Name: Anonymous 2020-03-04 18:20

8 Name: Anonymous 2020-03-05 1:59

9 Name: Anonymous 2020-03-05 2:38

10 Name: Anonymous 2020-03-05 13:17

11 Name: Anonymous 2020-03-06 2:39

12 Name: !L33tUKZj5I 2020-03-06 2:49

13 Name: !L33tUKZj5I 2020-03-06 2:50