How does one hex the Moon?

https://www.thecut.com/2020/07/some-tiktok-baby-witches-apparently-tried-to-hex-the-moon.html

The article already covers most of points, so rereading it will help.

1.The "Moon", is actually not referring to the planetary mass in particular, but a lunar deity(e.g. Chandra/Artemis/Hecate)/egregore/entity(Moon goddess) associated with the energy of the Moon.
Lunar qualities are Yin, Water and Darkness and are contrasted with Yang,Fire and Light of the Sun.

2. The Moon(as both planet and deity) has a psychic influence with tides having an etheric plane counterparent: the forces of the Moon are close to Earth. Its a great cosmic power in the sense of "magic", the lunar cycles and associated 'lunar energy' of moonlight are reflected in myth as dual to the Sun.

3.Zoomers influenced by Wicca and neo-pagan movement don't understand the forces they mess with, usually thinking in New Age mindframe where humans live in some fuzzy, harmless hippie camp planet where they can't do nothing wrong.

4.They are assumed the same group who tried to "hex the fae", a
species of etheric plane who operated with magic directly and doesn't operate within framework of human morality.
Both ideas are really bad as outlined in the article and the process itself has no difference from hexing an incorporeal spirit.

5.Interesting that lots of media catched on this, as if there some power behind these "beginner witches"(such stupid ideas don't come from thin air) and they want it public that they challenge the cosmic powers, the "normally atheist and secular" media somehow latched on this "twitter rumor" wholly embracing the "witchcraft is real and valid" theme despite "i fucking love science" promoted by same media.

https://www.balthazarkorab.com/2020/07/20/witches-on-tiktok-have-apparently-tried-to-hex-the-moon/
https://www.technologytimes.pk/2020/07/20/a-group-of-baby-witches-on-witchtok-is-going-around-casting-hexes/
https://www.dailydot.com/unclick/tiktok-witches-moon-hex/
https://www.techtimes.com/articles/251234/20200720/did-tiktoks-witches-hex-the-moon-witchtok-community-is-not-happy.htm
https://www.cnet.com/news/witches-on-tiktok-have-apparently-tried-to-hex-the-moon/
https://www.drewreportsnews.com/2020/07/20/the-latest-crazy-idea-in-town-witchtokers-trying-to-hex-the-moon/
https://www.sciencetimes.com/articles/26530/20200720/witches-band-together-tiktok-hex-moon-succeeded.htm
https://nypost.com/2020/07/20/witches-on-tiktok-have-reportedly-hexed-the-moon/
https://www.msn.com/en-us/lifestyle/parenting/marianne-williamson-wants-the-hexing-witches-of-tiktok-to-dream-bigger-than-the-moon/ar-BB16YwvS
https://www.lipstickalley.com/threads/tiktok-witches-hexing-the-moon-sun-and-fae.3727187/
https://thetab.com/uk/2020/07/21/witches-hexing-the-moon-and-the-memes-are-exquisite-167391
https://www.papermag.com/hexing-the-moon-2646442228.html
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/laurenstrapagiel/witchtok-hex-the-moon-fae-witchcraft

A sphere tessellated into hexes is called "geodesic sphere"

Those are sexagons, by the way.

Why is this on nyt?

hex my anus

>>5
We need reasonable broom&wand control.

A generation raised on Harry Potter and reruns of Sabrina the Teenage Witch predictably tries the cool occult stuff.

Occults scumbags are always neo-nazis.

>>9
Based.

>>1
Floss like you're hex on the moon depends on it

>>6
Underrated post. hex my anus, too

why hex the moon when you can base64 it

>>13
The hexers are the same crowd that rages at equaity. You avoid those pesky equal signs.

post. hex my anus, too
13 Name: Anonymous 2020-07-23 8:01

With a hex editor, obviously.

Write your hex editor cdr

>>16
Have you hexed the Moon, Cudder?

Array.from (document.getElementsByClassName ("trip")).forEach (e => { e.parentNode.parentNode.children [1].innerHTML = "I am a child seeking attention."; })

>>19
baka

>>19
That parentNode nesting is bad design:
https://voidlibrary.forumotion.me/t451-lack-of-tree-level-nesting-modifiers-in-javascript

>>21
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Element/closest

>>22
This is actually worse in terms of performance and usability than parent(n).
Its internally as slow as querySelectorAll and requires to know
exact selector, where in lots of cases its a generic <div>

>>23
You're right.

In some cases it's more solid though. If someone insert some extra nodes into the tree it'll still work. Happens sometimes for a quick layout/css hack or to add a label or something. On the other hand if they keep the position but change the name yours is superior.

Nice trick, tough. I'll keep that in mind. Sometimes yours semantically makes more sense + better perf always is good.