Reddit are bunch of white racist

http://lj.rossia.org/users/nashgold/70479.html


Got banned at Reddit after stating my intent about illegally immigrating to America and kill an ICE officer to prevent these racists from deporting me. I hope American racists will get the 2nd Haiti. Not Reason for the Racist America to Exist. Americans are no better than Russians.

>>39
Not only are you incompetent at using this site, you can't even be bothered to manufacture a fake source for your bullshit? How incompetent can you get? Here is how violence works: >>27

5. It is invariably the status quo that false-flags with violence using infiltrators.
5a. a white supremacist group posing as antifa activists was actually behind that account >>24
5b. Minneapolis protests: 'Umbrella Man' who broke windows is white supremacist, police say -- Man sought to incite racial tension and sparked chaos at peaceful demonstrations, police say -- https://dis.tinychan.net/read/prog/1587122567#reply_156
5c. [They] should do what I did when I was interior minister. … Pull back police from streets and colleges, infiltrate the movement with provocateurs ready for anything [emphasis added], and for ten days let protesters devastate shops, burn down cars, and set cities aflame. Then, emboldened by popular support … police should have no mercy and send them all to the hospital. Not arrest them, because prosecutors would just free them right away, but beat them all and beat the professors that encourage them. -- https://dis.tinychan.net/read/prog/1587122567#reply_105

Here is how manufacturing fake sources works:
https://dis.tinychan.net/read/prog/1587122567#reply_107

On Saturday, Fox apologized in an editor’s note posted to stories about CHAZ on its website, sayings its home-page photos “did not clearly delineate” the splicing together of multiple images from different locations. The editor’s note also acknowledged the erroneous use of the Minnesota rioting photo to illustrate Seattle news. “Fox News regrets these errors,” the note stated. -- https://primepatriot.com/2020/06/13/fox-news-runs-digitally-altered-images-in-coverage-of-seattles-protests-capitol-hill-autonomous-zone/

>>40
Anon has graciously cleared up this point:

I can take any political views, even contradictory, when it suits me. I.e. if Trump pays me a million USD to promote racism, I will be promoting racism, and if Hilary pays me million USD to speak against racism, I will be speaking against racism. >>30

>>38

You did not answer about whether there is any country you like.

Countries are always about accepting some archaic culture and paying taxes. Don't like either of that. So no. But you know some countries have weaker cultures and smaller taxes. Say during the Communism in USSR the tax was 100%, refusal to pay it was death sentence. So I have aversion to Communism. Since I dont want to pay and in USSR I would have already been long dead :D

>>43
What sort of social organization would you prefer to live in instead of countries? And what means of funding and resource allocation do you propose for large projects that cannot be accomplished by small scale cooperation between individuals, other than some form of taxation?

>>44

What sort of social organization would you prefer to live in instead of countries?

Something along the lines of anarchism, with the state role minimized as far as possible. But such society is obviously impossible without permanent revolution, since sooner or later any free society degrades into a dictatorship, when one clan gets a bias and grabs power. Therefore I advocate for permanent violence and struggle. Humanity cannot progress without a never ending bloody war. There will never be peace, unless you're content with being a slave.

And what means of funding and resource allocation do you propose for large projects that cannot be accomplished by small scale cooperation between individuals, other than some form of taxation?

If individuals don't want to voluntarily fund your project, then they dont need it. Taxing them is the form of partial slavery.

I.e. try to explain me why my tax money should go into building another Putin's summer palace or purchasing the world's largest yacht for one of his cronies. I personally could not explain it to myself, therefore I got into troubles in Russia and with numerous criminals cases open against me.

>>45

when one clan gets a bias and grabs power

Can you imagine the existence of a type of individual who, when put in charge through some unspecified mechanism, would run things for the overall benefit of humanity, the "greater good", disregarding and even going against narrow personal interest? Are you familiar with the Global Change Game experiments run by Bob Altemeyer?

If individuals don't want to voluntarily fund your project, then they dont need it. Taxing them is the form of partial slavery.

You did not address the large project aspect. Imagine some ancient country with a constant problem of devastating floods. Due to geography, e.g. the placement of rivers, mountains and flood plains, this country is naturally split into some number of regions, let's make it a round ten. Through dams and large scale earthworks the floods of each separate region can be solved or at least hugely ameliorated. The resources needed for solving any one region's problem, e.g. funds, manpower and materials, make the project impossible for any one region, but pooling the resources of all ten makes one project at a time possible, so they can all be done in sequence over a large time period, but not interleaved. The people of each region agree to voluntarily contribute funds and resources to solving their own region's problem because the benefits are huge, so no forcing is necessary, but not to the others' and certainly not if their own isn't done first. Every region is also afraid that whichever other region's project is done first, that region will no longer contribute to the other nine projects, and all ten are needed for each project. Voluntary agreement for resource pooling and for which project to do first isn't reached even after waiting dozens of generations, so the devastating floods continue. But everyone agrees that solving all ten in sequence would have huge benefits in improving the people's lives.

What is your proposed solution for this scenario? Should the floods be allowed to continue indefinitely? Should resource pooling and a project order be imposed by some sort of overall authority, which would solve the problem but would initially go against the wishes of ninety percent of the people? Or do you have a third path?

Forgot this part.

>>45

I.e. try to explain me why my tax money should go into building another Putin's summer palace or purchasing the world's largest yacht for one of his cronies

Obviously corruption and embezzlement are indefensible but that is separate from taxation itself.

>>46

Can you imagine the existence of a type of individual who, when put in charge through some unspecified mechanism, would run things for the overall benefit of humanity, the "greater good", disregarding and even going against narrow personal interest?

No. That individual would be incredible stupid to not steal a thing or not to establish a dictatorship. And a stupid individual will be displaced by a smart individual, who will steal everything for himself and enslave everyone. Because why not?

Obviously corruption and embezzlement are indefensible but that is separate from taxation itself.

Most of the taxes are stolen. And you're lucky if they go into another Putin's palace, instead another policing law, forcing everyone to insert buttplugs, so they wont smuggle something inside their anuses, and reporting to Kremlin.

You did not address the large project aspect. Imagine some ancient country with a constant problem of devastating floods.

I'm sure these citizens can agree between themselves and invest the money to fight floods, if they actually trust the person managing the project. But nobody trusts the government. Because government is the biggest con-man.

You have more followers here than on your livejournal blog, Nikigold Nashkov. Admit your roal.

Nice bot spam!

>>48

No. That individual [...]

So your worldview hinges on not accepting the existence of anyone who is simultaneously smart and selfless? Would your worldview become untenable if such people existed?

Most of the taxes are stolen.

Assuming for a moment for the sake of argument that this is true, the solution would still be to fix the stealing rather than remove taxation entirely, provided that taxation can be seen to have some narrow, legitimate, beneficial uses.

I'm sure these citizens can agree between themselves and invest the money to fight floods, if they actually trust the person managing the project.

This is your second evasion of the question. I just told you as part of the context that

Voluntary agreement for resource pooling and for which project to do first isn't reached even after waiting dozens of generations, so the devastating floods continue.

If you see taxation for any purpose as "the form of partial slavery" >>45 and it is so obvious to you that it is always a wrong, then I expect you to be prepared to defend your position with intellectual rectitude and answer the question >>46 in its full context. This excludes trivial sophistry like repeated evasion. Otherwise what you are telling us is that you forfeit defense of your position and you concede it untenable from the first challenge.