Reddit are bunch of white racist

http://lj.rossia.org/users/nashgold/70479.html


Got banned at Reddit after stating my intent about illegally immigrating to America and kill an ICE officer to prevent these racists from deporting me. I hope American racists will get the 2nd Haiti. Not Reason for the Racist America to Exist. Americans are no better than Russians.

>>1
Reddit is 90% niggers so can't be raCIST!

>>2
No they told me the following:

How about you try get an education and better yourself so that you can legally immigrate? I don’t understand why you think you have some right to live wherever you want? Its also not racist, I’m white and don’t qualify to immigrate to America either, having less melanin in my skin doesn’t give me a special whites only work visa.

You have no rights or freedoms in our country if you don’t belong there I.E have illegally immigrated.

You’re a citizen of your own country, and I will stop you with my gun if you ever come near my dog. Still waiting for an answer on what you think nazism actually is because right now you’re just sounding like an entitled ignorant brat.

So it’s not that a visa would cost too much it’s just that you don’t qualify to get one. Unfortunately countries don’t want unskilled and uneducated people immigrating.

These are the comments of several different Reddit users. And then they have banned me. They are very unwelcoming and xenophobic. If that is not racism and discrimination, then what is racism and discrimination?

Americans also quickly escalate to threaten you with their guns in any online discussion. I hope the have eyes on the back of their head. Because kill any white American and you will kill a racist.

What programming language is this?

If a sentence contains the word ’’y\’all’’, I automatically dismiss it.

>>5
American English - the language of the white racists.

and kill an ICE officer to prevent these racists from deporting me

You're lucky there's no common sense test for your citizenship of your country because you wouldn't pass that either.

>>7
I like English English.

https://dis.tinychan.net/read/lounge/1596834508

kek

Reddit is the home of racism:
http://lj.rossia.org/users/nashgold/72868.html

>>8
Who will deport me if the immigration police gets staff shortage? You know they cant just witch-hunt deport any random Jew back to Russia, they first need to prove that the Jew got to New York illegally, and that requires trained professional people to do investigation. These professionals are hard to replace if they die, especially if they die frequently. So it makes total sense to kill ICE officers.

>>13

they first need to prove that [...]

You have it completely backwards. Also, your antisemitism is so passé, shouldn't you be seething about Biden's VP pick instead, like a good little far-right drone?

>>14

You're not getting it. I actually have the plan to come to US and kill ICE officer to avoid deportation to Russia. I have nothing to lose. So why not? I have no other option.

>>14
Also. I'm not far right. To be right wing you need to belong to some nation and a country. I don't belong to any. I'm a citizen of Russia, but I despise Russians for being Nazis. Russia must be destroyed. Just like America.

I'm surprised you don't identify as a man of African descent yet.

>>17
Given that all human beings came out of African, I can identify as one.

>>18
Learn German, immigrate there. Don't threaten to kill anybody, just be a programmer. You're going to reply they're nazis with a subhuman language...

Your attack on the father who just lost his son was loathable. I don't even know why I still have some kind of sympathy for you. Finish you're game and call you're mother.

>>19
Germans are a bunch of Nazis, responsible for the Holocaust, and they have good relations with Putin.

That was no attack. I just talk to Americans the way they talk to me. I'm happy each time I hear about a white American dying underage, because that means more space for the people of color.

>>19
Also, it is impossible to work as a programmer in Germany without a university degree diploma and a ton of certifications. Germans are obsessed with that.

>>21
In fact, Germans have degrees and certifications even for janitors!

I.e. even if you somehow manage to get a stolen EU id card, you wont be able to work under it in the fields unless the stolen document set also includes the field work diploma.

So yeah, Germans need to be genocided just like they genocided minorities. And nothing of value will be lost.

>>15,16

to avoid deportation
So why not?

Your proposed course of action is exactly contradictory to your stated goal. Assuming no mental health issues we will have to believe your actions over your goal claim. For example, republicans claim to be pro-family while being the only ones blocking universal paid maternity leave.

To be right wing you need to [...]

The main reason we believe you to be far-right is that you are incompetent at false-flagging as a violence-advocating moonbat.

U.S. Law Enforcement, a page that claims to be run “by several current and retired US Law Enforcement Officers,” has also spread false information to its nearly 500,000 followers. It posted a screenshot of a tweet from what appeared to be an antifa account claiming that antifa would “move into the residential areas… the white hoods…. and we take what’s ours.” But as Twitter quickly noted, a white supremacist group posing as antifa activists was actually behind that account. The U.S. Law Enforcement page has since acknowledged that the tweet was debunked, and suggested this happened because the Twitter account “may not have been ‘official.’” Yet it has not removed the false post from its page. -- https://www.huffpost.com/entry/police-protests-floyd-law-enforcement-today-rant_n_5ee3ef5fc5b699cea53196b4 -- https://www.factcheck.org/2020/06/viral-tweet-alert-wasnt-from-antifa/?fbclid=IwAR1acMMJ47Hh0xUw_-6dSusYAYM9HSzxXrCWXvjsNRku9IlLbTYF2HNLpNc

>>24

Your proposed course of action is exactly contradictory to your stated goal.

My goal is immigrating into US. If I just enter US illegally, I will get deported, even if I commit a minor crime. The only crime that truly blocks deportation is a murder of a US citizen. Who else deserves the death more than the ICE fascists?

The main reason we believe you to be far-right is that you are incompetent at false-flagging as a violence-advocating moonbat.

Rights are not given. Tree of freedom wont grow without the constant watering blood. So violence is inevitable. Look at the Russian Empire. Do you believe Tsar and his nobility would have stepped back voluntarily? No. Only the bloody civil war can give the rights. Peaceful protests don't work. Seizing government buildings and executing the fascists does work. It wont make the Heaven on Earth, but at least the puts the train back on the rails.

>>25
https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/crime/2019/02/12/jew-who-fled-persecution-belarus-faces-deportation-after-crash/2795789002/

Milwaukee man on track for deportation to Belarus where he says he was persecuted for being a Jew.

>>25

Rights are not given. Tree of freedom wont grow without the constant watering blood. So violence is inevitable.
Peaceful protests don't work.

1. Your argument is circular. You are in effect assuming the conclusion.
2. When the the roman plebeians had enough of being treated like cattle while the patricians needed them for the day-to-day running of the city, they left en masse leaving the elites to try to run the city without them using only their slaves. Enough of them participated that the elites blinked first, and to get them to return conceded a series of rights like due process regardless of financial means.
3. The suffragettes achieved the vote without resorting to organized violence, which would have undermined the entire movement.
4. Abortion rights campaigners are not the violence users, it's the anti-abortion side that bombs abortion clinics.
5. It is invariably the status quo that false-flags with violence using infiltrators.

5a. a white supremacist group posing as antifa activists was actually behind that account >>24
5b. Minneapolis protests: 'Umbrella Man' who broke windows is white supremacist, police say -- Man sought to incite racial tension and sparked chaos at peaceful demonstrations, police say -- https://dis.tinychan.net/read/prog/1587122567#reply_156
5c. [They] should do what I did when I was interior minister. … Pull back police from streets and colleges, infiltrate the movement with provocateurs ready for anything [emphasis added], and for ten days let protesters devastate shops, burn down cars, and set cities aflame. Then, emboldened by popular support … police should have no mercy and send them all to the hospital. Not arrest them, because prosecutors would just free them right away, but beat them all and beat the professors that encourage them. -- https://dis.tinychan.net/read/prog/1587122567#reply_105

6. Advocating violence for a cause where organized action through peaceful protests and political pressure is known to work, and where violence can only undermine the cause to the status quo's delight, automatically marks you as an agent provocateur, and not a bright one either since you immediately give yourself away.

>>27
On the other hand, Russians did the revolution in a non peaceful way, completely cleansing the archaic tsarist elites and greatly improving the lives of poor people. And the Greek and Roman people gained true freedom only when the barbarians have burned that slave-owner paradise down. So no true freedom can be achieved without violence.

>>28
The only problem with Russian revolution is that the Tsarist system began rebuilding itself with Stalin, who has even made the Christian church legal again. That is why revolution should never stop, and each day a new Tsar must be publicly executed together with his bloodsucking family of exploiters. Revolution is not an event, it is the continuous process. We can never rest.

>>27
And again murder is a potent way to avoid deportation. I read about numerous immigrants who murdered their cellmates at deportation prison to impede the deportation. I'm not a political activist and I'm just computer programmer and an immigrant. I have no place in your 1-dimenional political spectra. I can take any political views, even contradictory, when it suits me. I.e. if Trump pays me a million USD to promote racism, I will be promoting racism, and if Hilary pays me million USD to speak against racism, I will be speaking against racism.

For now I just hope that Americans will start killing each other in a civil war, so America will become less full and I could immigrate there. America actually needs a bloodshed.

>>30
I.e. today I support both sides of the conflict, cheering for every American death.

>>28-31

the Greek and Roman people gained true freedom only when the barbarians have burned that slave-owner paradise down

Slavery continued without any problems after the fall of Rome. The conditions started to slowly improve when successive waves of bubonic plague caused a severe labor shortage.

So no true freedom can be achieved without violence.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman

No true Scotsman, or appeal to purity, is an informal fallacy in which one attempts to protect a universal generalization from counterexamples by changing the definition in an ad hoc fashion to exclude the counterexample. Rather than denying the counterexample or rejecting the original claim, this fallacy modifies the subject of the assertion to exclude the specific case or others like it by rhetoric, without reference to any specific objective rule: "no true Scotsman would do such a thing"; i.e., those who perform that action are not part of our group and thus criticism of that action is not criticism of the group.

I can take any political views, even contradictory, when it suits me

Thank you for clearing that up. I mistakenly thought that you were attempting to construct an argument.

>>32

Thank you for clearing that up. I mistakenly thought that you were attempting to construct an argument.

My argument is: pay me money and I will follow the party line. Otherwise I will be false flagging from the both sides, writing nasty things. Nostrovia!

>>33
OK. But then the curious part becomes: if you do not have anything you believe in enough to stand up for it, and all your opinions are up for sale, why is "Otherwise I will be false flagging from the both sides, writing nasty things" worth your time?

>>34
Because that increases the chance one American will kill another, so you will be less full and open to immigrants like me.

America has also decline my visa application. Not under Trump but under Obama. So I have personal hatred against your country. So killing ICE officer and causing a shitshtorm looks like a nice way to say "thank you, dear Americans!"

So I'm not right wing, I'm not left wing. I just hate Americans. Edited on 14/08/2020 21:06.

>>34
Because that increases the chance one American will kill another, so you will be less full and open to immigrants like me.

America has also decline my visa application. Not under Trump but under Obama. So I have personal hatred against your country. So killing ICE officer an causing a shitshtorm looks like a nice to say "thank you, dear Americans!"
America has also decline my visa application. Not under Trump but under Obama. So I have personal hatred against your country. So killing ICE officer and causing a shitshtorm looks like a nice way to say "thank you, dear Americans!"↵
↵
So I'm not right wing, I'm not left wing. I just hate Americans.

>>35

so you will be less full
your country

I'm not from the US, Sherlock.

Because that increases the chance one American will kill another

But no one gives any credence to someone with fluid and contradictory stances, so your false-flagging won't be anywhere near as efficient as it might be if you had credibility. That means that you are destroying the efficiency of your chosen tool, regardless of whether that tool choice makes any sense to begin with.

So I have personal hatred
I just hate Americans.

Why emigrate from one country you hate to another country you hate? Wouldn't you rather pick a country you like? Aren't there any?

I'm not from the US, Sherlock.

So why do you care?

But no one gives any credence to someone with fluid and contradictory stances, so your false-flagging won't be anywhere near as efficient as it might be if you had credibility. That means that you are destroying the efficiency of your chosen tool, regardless of whether that tool choice makes any sense to begin with.

Not everyone is as smart as you. We are talking about the complete drooling American right wingers. These creatures have less intelligence than a retarded hamster.

So why bothering puting in any effort, if most alt-rights get triggered?

Why emigrate from one country you hate to another country you hate? Wouldn't you rather pick a country you like? Aren't there any?

I also hate Russia and don't speak Russian. All countries, especially English speaking, have very strict immigration visa requirements. And I cant be bothered to learn another language. Swahili is not C++. You cant learn it in 24 hours.

>>37

So why do you care?

The caring part extended as far as making it clear that advocating violence did not come from any sort of genuine BLM supporter or similar. >>24 Most of us aren't dumb enough to undermine our cause like that. Those who are, and who could be emotionally manipulated into it, are told explicitly and repeatedly to leave communication to those of us who are not.

complete drooling

It is never a good idea to underestimate whoever happens to oppose you today. In the overwhelming majority of countries the secret police, more politely called the intelligence service, has considerably more than just slight far-right leanings.

All countries

You did not answer about whether there is any country you like.

>>38
>advocating violence
Tell that to the five year white boy a BLM protester killed.

What's happening here? A non-US BLM supporter accusing a mentally ill stateless Russian of being a far-right activist?
I'm not even going to ask what programming language is this, because I don't want to know.

>>39
Not only are you incompetent at using this site, you can't even be bothered to manufacture a fake source for your bullshit? How incompetent can you get? Here is how violence works: >>27

5. It is invariably the status quo that false-flags with violence using infiltrators.
5a. a white supremacist group posing as antifa activists was actually behind that account >>24
5b. Minneapolis protests: 'Umbrella Man' who broke windows is white supremacist, police say -- Man sought to incite racial tension and sparked chaos at peaceful demonstrations, police say -- https://dis.tinychan.net/read/prog/1587122567#reply_156
5c. [They] should do what I did when I was interior minister. … Pull back police from streets and colleges, infiltrate the movement with provocateurs ready for anything [emphasis added], and for ten days let protesters devastate shops, burn down cars, and set cities aflame. Then, emboldened by popular support … police should have no mercy and send them all to the hospital. Not arrest them, because prosecutors would just free them right away, but beat them all and beat the professors that encourage them. -- https://dis.tinychan.net/read/prog/1587122567#reply_105

Here is how manufacturing fake sources works:
https://dis.tinychan.net/read/prog/1587122567#reply_107

On Saturday, Fox apologized in an editor’s note posted to stories about CHAZ on its website, sayings its home-page photos “did not clearly delineate” the splicing together of multiple images from different locations. The editor’s note also acknowledged the erroneous use of the Minnesota rioting photo to illustrate Seattle news. “Fox News regrets these errors,” the note stated. -- https://primepatriot.com/2020/06/13/fox-news-runs-digitally-altered-images-in-coverage-of-seattles-protests-capitol-hill-autonomous-zone/

>>40
Anon has graciously cleared up this point:

I can take any political views, even contradictory, when it suits me. I.e. if Trump pays me a million USD to promote racism, I will be promoting racism, and if Hilary pays me million USD to speak against racism, I will be speaking against racism. >>30

>>38

You did not answer about whether there is any country you like.

Countries are always about accepting some archaic culture and paying taxes. Don't like either of that. So no. But you know some countries have weaker cultures and smaller taxes. Say during the Communism in USSR the tax was 100%, refusal to pay it was death sentence. So I have aversion to Communism. Since I dont want to pay and in USSR I would have already been long dead :D

>>43
What sort of social organization would you prefer to live in instead of countries? And what means of funding and resource allocation do you propose for large projects that cannot be accomplished by small scale cooperation between individuals, other than some form of taxation?

>>44

What sort of social organization would you prefer to live in instead of countries?

Something along the lines of anarchism, with the state role minimized as far as possible. But such society is obviously impossible without permanent revolution, since sooner or later any free society degrades into a dictatorship, when one clan gets a bias and grabs power. Therefore I advocate for permanent violence and struggle. Humanity cannot progress without a never ending bloody war. There will never be peace, unless you're content with being a slave.

And what means of funding and resource allocation do you propose for large projects that cannot be accomplished by small scale cooperation between individuals, other than some form of taxation?

If individuals don't want to voluntarily fund your project, then they dont need it. Taxing them is the form of partial slavery.

I.e. try to explain me why my tax money should go into building another Putin's summer palace or purchasing the world's largest yacht for one of his cronies. I personally could not explain it to myself, therefore I got into troubles in Russia and with numerous criminals cases open against me.

>>45

when one clan gets a bias and grabs power

Can you imagine the existence of a type of individual who, when put in charge through some unspecified mechanism, would run things for the overall benefit of humanity, the "greater good", disregarding and even going against narrow personal interest? Are you familiar with the Global Change Game experiments run by Bob Altemeyer?

If individuals don't want to voluntarily fund your project, then they dont need it. Taxing them is the form of partial slavery.

You did not address the large project aspect. Imagine some ancient country with a constant problem of devastating floods. Due to geography, e.g. the placement of rivers, mountains and flood plains, this country is naturally split into some number of regions, let's make it a round ten. Through dams and large scale earthworks the floods of each separate region can be solved or at least hugely ameliorated. The resources needed for solving any one region's problem, e.g. funds, manpower and materials, make the project impossible for any one region, but pooling the resources of all ten makes one project at a time possible, so they can all be done in sequence over a large time period, but not interleaved. The people of each region agree to voluntarily contribute funds and resources to solving their own region's problem because the benefits are huge, so no forcing is necessary, but not to the others' and certainly not if their own isn't done first. Every region is also afraid that whichever other region's project is done first, that region will no longer contribute to the other nine projects, and all ten are needed for each project. Voluntary agreement for resource pooling and for which project to do first isn't reached even after waiting dozens of generations, so the devastating floods continue. But everyone agrees that solving all ten in sequence would have huge benefits in improving the people's lives.

What is your proposed solution for this scenario? Should the floods be allowed to continue indefinitely? Should resource pooling and a project order be imposed by some sort of overall authority, which would solve the problem but would initially go against the wishes of ninety percent of the people? Or do you have a third path?

Forgot this part.

>>45

I.e. try to explain me why my tax money should go into building another Putin's summer palace or purchasing the world's largest yacht for one of his cronies

Obviously corruption and embezzlement are indefensible but that is separate from taxation itself.

>>46

Can you imagine the existence of a type of individual who, when put in charge through some unspecified mechanism, would run things for the overall benefit of humanity, the "greater good", disregarding and even going against narrow personal interest?

No. That individual would be incredible stupid to not steal a thing or not to establish a dictatorship. And a stupid individual will be displaced by a smart individual, who will steal everything for himself and enslave everyone. Because why not?

Obviously corruption and embezzlement are indefensible but that is separate from taxation itself.

Most of the taxes are stolen. And you're lucky if they go into another Putin's palace, instead another policing law, forcing everyone to insert buttplugs, so they wont smuggle something inside their anuses, and reporting to Kremlin.

You did not address the large project aspect. Imagine some ancient country with a constant problem of devastating floods.

I'm sure these citizens can agree between themselves and invest the money to fight floods, if they actually trust the person managing the project. But nobody trusts the government. Because government is the biggest con-man.

You have more followers here than on your livejournal blog, Nikigold Nashkov. Admit your roal.

Nice bot spam!

>>48

No. That individual [...]

So your worldview hinges on not accepting the existence of anyone who is simultaneously smart and selfless? Would your worldview become untenable if such people existed?

Most of the taxes are stolen.

Assuming for a moment for the sake of argument that this is true, the solution would still be to fix the stealing rather than remove taxation entirely, provided that taxation can be seen to have some narrow, legitimate, beneficial uses.

I'm sure these citizens can agree between themselves and invest the money to fight floods, if they actually trust the person managing the project.

This is your second evasion of the question. I just told you as part of the context that

Voluntary agreement for resource pooling and for which project to do first isn't reached even after waiting dozens of generations, so the devastating floods continue.

If you see taxation for any purpose as "the form of partial slavery" >>45 and it is so obvious to you that it is always a wrong, then I expect you to be prepared to defend your position with intellectual rectitude and answer the question >>46 in its full context. This excludes trivial sophistry like repeated evasion. Otherwise what you are telling us is that you forfeit defense of your position and you concede it untenable from the first challenge.