Where is "the attached court decision from the Hamburg Regional Court that describes the technological measure at issue (known as YouTube’s “rolling cipher”), and the court’s determination that the technology employed by YouTube is an effective technical measure within the meaning of EU"?
copyright owner: here's the video for free Youtube: provides it for free User: downloads what he views copyright owner: you aren't supposed to do that. Sues the tool developer that allows such heinous crime NOT aware that mechanism is available to any downloader in principle.
Youtube allows you to download the file data for free, its no longer in its domain when you reconstruct it to do anything.
Name:
Anonymous2020-10-24 11:20
german law is a nightmare. They're Nazis and will forever be. It's just their culture.
There's a law that you have to have your address on all your websites, if you live in germany.
There's a law that you have to have a license to stream, if you have more than 500 viewers.
>>12 Every linux distro of note has yt-dl in its repos, besides thousands of local copies from developers. Its not some "one point of failure scenario" where companies(like..Lizard Entertainment) lose their sole code repository by mistake.
Name:
Anonymous2020-10-28 2:33
All we have to do is get a Pull Request approved that adds https://github.com/github/dmca to its own list of takedowns, thereby removing the DMCA from the internet forever.