Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Planck length

Name: Anonymous 2021-03-30 19:24

Believing that planck length is the smallest possible length within the universe is for main stream spoon fed pseudo intellectuals. The true nature of the miniscule resides within the idea of infinite divisibility and the notion that nothing cannot exist. ITT we boast about our intellectual superiority over planck length brainlets. All posters that say planck length is the smallest possible measurement/length will be met with extreme aggression and conversion to the truth will commence.

Name: Anonymous 2021-03-31 4:37

>>1
this reminds me of 1-0.999...=0 relying on Archimedean property(no infinitesimals), which is absurd when you examine it logically.

Name: Anonymous 2021-03-31 7:41

Isn't the planck length just when our models stop working? I don't think fantasy guesses will be accurate.

Name: Anonymous 2021-03-31 10:50

https://textboard.org/prog/184
As for the archimedean trolling, you can dismiss it entirely. The proof is quite simple. If a field is ordered and is non-archimedean then it is incomplete, but R is both ordered and complete, thus R is archimedean. The other proof that was posted >>31 >>33 is also valid.

Name: Anonymous 2021-03-31 16:27

>>4
real numbers are archimedean by convention, the proof "its not real because we define it as real only if follows archimedean property'(circular logic).

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List