>>3994 https://8chan.moe/t/res/3921.html#3994>the fact that you can marry "cute young girls" that aren't children,
Wrong. Girls, by definition, are children. And no: you cannot actually have a "cute" woman: what you are enjoying is the makeup: not the actuality. Another component of cuteness is the personality and the lack of history.
The man does not exist for the benefit of the woman and I will not accept that he does no matter how "morally objectional" the scum of the earth (white people) demand otherwise.
There is nothing "morally objectional" about YHWH's law: which explicitly allows child brides and explicitly sets the man as the ba'al (master/lord/etc) of the female.
Whites just simply follow another religion: the worship of the white woman, constructively. As do you.
Also another thing that makes young girls good brides is that they can be yours: and NOT their own person. YHWH notes the man is the ba'al (master/lord) of the female. This comports with the Law of YHWH's pro-child bride position. It is impossible with adult women: she cannot be yours: she is her own and others.
Additionally dating adult women is adultery: YHWH notes that you may not take other men's women. The hebrew simply specifies man, woman, girl, etc. Not the false-translations whites read (Husband, Wife, etc (but note: these translations are false because of the changes in the English language itself. Wif simply means woman in older iterations of the language).
>making your lack of OPSEC even more foolish
Tell me what my "lack of OPSEC" is? Do you know my identity? No. Does your friend in belief?
>As I said before, despite my disgust at your position,
No.
I am willing to die for my beliefs. I will not back down. I will not censor them. It is mans right to have young virgin female children as brides. A right given by YHWH: and stolen by white people like yourself who find anything good for men and BAD for women "morally objectionable".
Yes it is BAD for women when the man isn't a mule. But it is good for men.
I had to make a decision. The programmers were adament that Grsecurity was "not violating the GPL" and "you are not a lawyer". The arguments were not working on them. Citing law and cases wasn't working. Showing censored versions of my IDs helped.
Same with using 4chan. There is not one proxy in this world that works with 4chan. So to get my pro-child bride message, regarding YHWH's law, out: I had to use 4chan.
Just as the french philosophers, to get their anti-age-of-consent message out; had to sign their names.
>>Were the French philosophers foolish when they signed their anti-age-of-consent petition in the 70s?
>From what I understand of the situation, yes.
Go to hell.
(presumably popular project lead on an open-source game who condones child brides who has poor enough OPSEC to have his ideas be traced back to him, and probably even admitted that those were his posts
I am not going to hide my beliefs about child brides. It is a Natural Right of man to marry cute young girls; aswell as a Religious Right.