White chirstians lying about YHWH's law

https://archive.wakarimasen.moe/his/thread/10697314/#q10698118

>">>10698046
>Not really in context, he is “married in according to the law”, and while he is not allowed to live with his “new wife”, he is now banned from marrying anyone else. And that only if her father consent to it, which is to be supposed out of Exodus 22:16, it being not likely that the father should lose his paternal right of disposing his child when she was in some sort forced, rather than when she was enticed.

Wrong, Dipshit. Devarim chapter 22 verse 28 is NOT Exodus 22:16. Devarim chapter 22 verse 28 is about raping female children. And yes the man DOES keep the girl: she is now a woman of his. And, NO, dipshit: he is not "barred from "marrying" anyone else". There is NO limit to the number of female a man may be the ba'al (master) of in YHWH's law.

Notice how the white faggot fucking chirstians always corrupt YHWH's law to be pro-woman and anti-man.
Notice it?

In Devarim it DOES NOT SAY "DURRR SHE BECOMES HIS WHOIFE, AND HE CANT MARRY ANYONE ELSE!!!, AND HE DOESN'T KEEP HER!!!! DURRR"

No. It makes NO mention of "wives" "marraige" and other concepts white PIECES OF SHIT believe in. It says if a man rapes (tahpahs (as in to take: to take a city)) a little girl who is still in her fathers house; and they are discovered; and the little girl was not promised to someone else; then the man pays the father 50 pieces of silver, and she is his female; and he shall not send her away from himself all of his days because he has humiliated her.

So yes: He has forcibly raped a small female child (this is what humiliates (humbles)) in her fathers house. He does not send her away.

But white fucks think "DURRR THIS IS BAD FOR MUHHH WHOITE WHHHHHHUUUUHHHHHMAN".
Tell me: white fucking pieces of shit: How can one "not send her away" if one doesn't come into posession of the girl. DipSHIT FUCK.
How does a girl become one's female (posessive) if one cannot possess her? HMMM WHITE FUCK. Going to tell us you PIECES OF FUCKING SHIT?

I hate that white fucking pieces of shit oppose men marrying cute little girls.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=PK7P7uZFf5o[Embed]


>t. white people.

YHWH explicitly allows marrying little girls, no matter what, even if fathers boycott allowing such (like white fucks do): YHWH says you can rape the young girls and keep them anyway. He doesn't allow boycotts.

According to YHWH's law whites should come to an end (Devarim: if someone approaches you and entices you to follow another Power: kill them). White fucking pieces of shit do not allow YHWH's law anywhere on this planet. They b0mb every country that allowed marrying cute little girls.

>>4666
>Do you think a grammatical possessive always indicates property ownership?

Ownership is dominion and control.
If the man has dominion and control over the girl he owns her.

I didn't say anything about grammar. The masoretic text was not written in English, the Septuagint was not written in English.
I said that the hebrew says that the girl is now the man's female. This is possession.

The hebrew also says that he may not send her away. That means he is in possession of her. White people, like yourself, are pieces of shit that deny everything YHWH's law stands for.

YHWH's law explicitly, in the same Book (Devarim) refers to the man as the Ba'al of the female. The same title given to pagan gods.
Master/Lord/Ruler/god.

You white FUCKS deny this.
Additionally in Devarim everything was practical.
It does NOT say Husband / Wife as english white fucks understand this.
It says, in the hebrew:
Man, master.
Female, girl.
Those are the words used in the hebrew.
NOT Husband. NOT Wife.

It was based on actual life: not the legal fictions you white FUCKS twist everything with.

Boy-friend girl-fried relationships are the same as what is described there: but the man's physical power and will to kill rivals and enemies is what is permitted, sanctioned, and recognized. Just as a strong boy-friend would fight and kill anyone who would try to take the woman he is FUCKING. Do you understand you piece of shit?

That boy-friend is a man (male). That "girl"-friend is a woman. The man if FUCKING her. He is not allowing other men to do the same. That satisfies the language in Devarim. If you fuck that female who's already being fucked by this guy: that satisfies the language regarding adultery. In hebrew. The woman is not permitted to leave her "boy"friend either. And this is natural: since a man would NOT allow that unless POLICE STATE existed to stop him from exercising his POWER.

Read the Hebrew you dipshit white FUCK.
It is NOT about what you complete scum call "husband" "wife".

It is about Man, Master. Woman. And little GIRLS (Female children).

>>4666
>Do you think patriarchy is the only defense against matriarchy?
Patriarchy is the rule of fathers. What is evident in Devarim is the rule of Men. Not fathers. Men may rape little girls that have not yet been promised to another, in their very fathers house, and they then keep that little girl and pay the father 50 silver; which is 1 and a half more than the customary 20 silver that virgin girls were sold for.

The fathers cannot prevent this in Devarim. They cannot boycott the Men. The Men are Ba'al: ruler: lord: judge: master. Of the female.

White people are incapable of anything good for men. They hate it in their blood. YHWH is right to destroy them if he has chosen to do so.
Patriarchy? With whites that is just used to enforce women's rights and women's values on the young men.

Based MikeeUSA telling it how it is.

>>1
Who's yhwh? The king of all Jews?

I have just instantiated a shart pointer, and it's pointing at >>1