>>4 Developers/programmers we need more man hours here!
Developers/programmers we need more man hours here!
Halting the set.
O'Donnoghue's Cuckulus says a different story.
Name:
Anonymous2022-11-09 6:54
Ooo I add da URL to it. It didn't have one before. That because I added it to it. I the intellectual doggy. In da field of da computer I smart. I get my vaccination too.
Name:
Anonymous2022-11-09 7:24
Watching TV right now. Does this make me a beta cuck? You cannot tell for sure with this information only. Am I watching The Soycollectors on channel 1? Or am I watching Masculinity Rediscovered on channel 4?
Name:
Anonymous2022-11-09 7:24
(this is a post about computer science)
Name:
Anonymous2022-11-10 15:07
Master your pseudopenis
Name:
Anonymous2022-11-10 15:49
Since programs are written primarily for humans to read (see Abelson and Sussman 1988), pseudocode is a legitimate programming language.
Name:
Anonymous2022-11-10 18:12
>>10 It's not, unless you can make the computer run it as a program. At which point it stops being pseudocode. Writing programs that are nice to read is way harder than writing programs, anyway, which is probably why literate programming didn't really take off.
>>14 I've read it partially (up to second last chapter, I think, without doing the exercises) and there was nothing about these types of programs there (i.e. graphical networking programs).
Name:
Anonymous2022-11-26 7:13
>>13 Cudder be like, ``libcurl? no thank you!'' then proceed to rewrite basic http functionality for 15 years and running