seeking a roommate

I have an IQ of 196 and am seeking a roommate of my same mental capacity with whom I can engage in casual conversations about quantum mechanics and theoretical astrophysics. I am smarter than 99% of the people I encounter; however being as insanely smart as I am can be quite a burden. For instance, I can never win arguments because the reason I'm right is too complex to explain within the attention span of my opponent. Alas, nobody understands my plight. I often stay up at night reading Chaucer and contemplating the repercussions of false philosophy. I love astounding everybody in the library by finishing a 419 page novel in just under 100 minutes. I am also a passionate artist and musician. Just earlier I heard a door squeak a melodic minor 7th, something only a true musician would realize. Last night I wrote a poem while in a club. Of course I of all people would stop dancing in the middle of a dance floor at 11:40 at night and start to ponder about the decay of our society. How disquieting the institution of superficiality in contemporary culture is. We exist in a zeitgeist bastardization of those principles our forefathers strove to exemplify. If you're going to be my roommate you must enjoy classical, enchanting tunes; not the talentless, computerized sounds that the modern generation "listens" (if you can even call it that) to. You must also agree with me on the following points:
- The black race holds itself back, and is not being held back by other races
- The middle east needs to go
- Gender identity issues are a mental illness
- You 100% can work your way out of poverty, people who think otherwise are just lazy and thus show why they are in poverty.
If you meet all of my qualifications, I will potentially consider you as a possible roommate.

P.S. I could have gotten more intellectual with my profound vocabulary but decided to dumb it down so that your lesser minds could fully comprehend the meaning of my words.

>>47
That's not really the definition of capitalism though. Mutually beneficial relationships can also exist in feudalism, communism, etc. And in practice, capitalism is rarely a perfectly balanced mutual relationship, as one side often has more power than the other.

>>48

Wow! Really? "I won't stop you from leaving Gulag" is worse than "I will make it possible you will remain in Gulag for the rest of your sorry life"?

No, of course not. Liberty means "I won't stop you from eating, and I won't stop you from starving". But liberty alone is not sufficient for a good life, you must also have the means to provide for yourself. And some people would gladly give up some of their liberty in exchange for having the means to provide for themselves, if someone is starving, a deal like "I'll give you three meals a day if you agree to do what I say" sounds pretty good to them. This is actually pretty much what employment is, you give up your liberty for say 8 hours a day, and get paid in exchange for that.

So much freedom for collective farm workers, because Mr. Stalin made it possible for them to work for the Glorious Soviet Russia.

Forced labor isn't freedom or liberty. However, one might find forced labor in exchange for food and housing to be preferable to having "freedom" or "liberty" when no work is available.