seeking a roommate

I have an IQ of 196 and am seeking a roommate of my same mental capacity with whom I can engage in casual conversations about quantum mechanics and theoretical astrophysics. I am smarter than 99% of the people I encounter; however being as insanely smart as I am can be quite a burden. For instance, I can never win arguments because the reason I'm right is too complex to explain within the attention span of my opponent. Alas, nobody understands my plight. I often stay up at night reading Chaucer and contemplating the repercussions of false philosophy. I love astounding everybody in the library by finishing a 419 page novel in just under 100 minutes. I am also a passionate artist and musician. Just earlier I heard a door squeak a melodic minor 7th, something only a true musician would realize. Last night I wrote a poem while in a club. Of course I of all people would stop dancing in the middle of a dance floor at 11:40 at night and start to ponder about the decay of our society. How disquieting the institution of superficiality in contemporary culture is. We exist in a zeitgeist bastardization of those principles our forefathers strove to exemplify. If you're going to be my roommate you must enjoy classical, enchanting tunes; not the talentless, computerized sounds that the modern generation "listens" (if you can even call it that) to. You must also agree with me on the following points:
- The black race holds itself back, and is not being held back by other races
- The middle east needs to go
- Gender identity issues are a mental illness
- You 100% can work your way out of poverty, people who think otherwise are just lazy and thus show why they are in poverty.
If you meet all of my qualifications, I will potentially consider you as a possible roommate.

P.S. I could have gotten more intellectual with my profound vocabulary but decided to dumb it down so that your lesser minds could fully comprehend the meaning of my words.

redditor here AMA

PHAIL

am seeking a roommate of my same mental capacity
decided to dumb it down so that your lesser minds

What an oxymoronic anus!

>>2
That's the joke.

It was an entertaining shitpost, but I'm not sure how I could possible respond in an engaging way.

>>4
That's okay, kid. You'll get there one day. I recommend studying the posting style of >>2 to see how it is done.

>>5
Using BBCode to style your post doesn't necessarily make it engaging.

>>6
Correct. It takes a lot more to properly engage with a shitpost. But if you continue to study the subtleties of >>2's post, soon it will all become clear.

>>7
Does it have to do with "anus"?

What if the middle-eastern race is delayed?
Number u(SA) i presume
Probably but who wants to pay more people welfare
Perhaps, but there are limits to capitalism. It would appear there must always exist more-or-less `poor' people for currency to function currently.

I am a poor, middle eastern nigger with gender identity issues, what are my chances?

>>10
If dubs, you're in.

I of all people would stop dancing in the middle of a dance floor at 11:40 at night
I have an IQ of 196

Was that dog IQ?

>>12
No, that dog was not IQ.

>>13
How do you know >>1 is not a dog on the interner?
Picture_of_dog_sitting_on_computer_chair.jpg

>>14
Because dogs can't use computers you extreme fucking retard

>>15
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/32/da/5c/32da5c3314fcc5ebf1a7b7d1548fcb03.jpg
http://www.groovythemes.com/animals/dog_using_computer-med.jpg
https://3.bp.blogspot.com/--qflv1mtcA8/UIohkj5AfqI/AAAAAAAAAjs/lPWMAQixraE/s1600/Dog+And+Laptop.jpg
https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-NBX1DEMcj9I/UIohshYDZfI/AAAAAAAAAkc/30nzzXjWOV8/s1600/Funny+Dog+Using+Computer.jpg
http://www.open.edu/openlearn/sites/www.open.edu.openlearn/files/ole_images/dreamstime_xs_23851888_inline.jpg
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/tAmSbvNELLg/hqdefault.jpg

>>16
I will be the second dog!

>>17
http://www.espmag.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Pudsey-Typing-c.-Penny-Butler.jpg

This thread is now about Haskell the dog.

>>19
You're not the boss of this thread cocksucker eat this sage like you do a dick assnigger!

Of course i'm not the boss, its him:
http://1funny.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/dog-chair.jpg

>>20
Oh no, a downvote!

I think the middle east should go to the far west.

This thread is now about having sex with Yuuka Kagamin.

>>24
Don't do it

LOGIC FOR DOGS
http://my.fit.edu/~aberdein/DogLogic.pdf

>>26
wtf .pdf??! Is it a virus?

>>27
A mental virus. Yes.

>>1
You know, it's a funny thing.

I am a atheist intellectual philosopher. I was actually diagnosed with Asperger's syndrome when I was 7. When I was a toddler, I nearly starved before my parents figured out they'd have to separate my food and arrange it by color and size.

When I went to school, I was literally unable to look people in the eye. Every day, I would go to class and look around the floor and wonder why all the dirt was there. I thought my classmates were crazy because I can't distinguish between voices and I thought they were arguing with themselves.

When I went to high school, I joined the electronics AND computer clubs so I could spend more time with electronics. It wasn't really the equipment-- I had my own Pentium III running Arch at home-- but the *smell* of the solder that I was going for.

That's why, in my group home, I installed Gentoo-- for ease of use, you understand-- on everyone's computers and moved into the attic the first chance I got. I fantasized about smells and workings of equipment and would sometimes steal people's routers and install OpenWRT on them.

Naturally, I picked up Anime somewhere along the line. Some serious discussion forum, I guess.

Right now, I'm teaching a software development class.

Yet this post and its poster are somehow more autistic than I.

>>1,29

stop dancing in the middle of a dance floor
Pentium III running Arch

You're both copypasta, bad copypasta that exposes what normies think of real intellectuals.

This whole thread is leftie scum getting triggered over the fact that anyone with any substantial intellectual capacity will be a Right-winger.

WIsh I was good at creative writing, sigh

>>32
sighing won't get you there.

>>31
If that's true, then why do right-wingers say college professors are pushing a liberal agenda?

>>34
Right-wing is not opposed to the liberal values.

>>35
In America, liberal means leftist.

>>36

In Russia "liberal" is synonymous with neo-Nazi (in American sense). So Russian Trump (Alexander Maltsev) is considered "liberal". There is no Hillary in Russia, because Russian women are too lazy and too stupid.

>>37
Well "liberal" in Marxist philosophy refers to those leftists who believe in gradual societal reform, rather than violent revolution.

And why do you consider Alexander Maltsev to be a "Russian Trump"? The only person I was able to find by that name is a former hockey player.

>>38

Sorry, I meant https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vyacheslav_Maltsev

Guys, liberal means someone who values liberty.

>>40
"liberty" is a relative concept.

>>41
You mean an inherently bigoted and oppressive concept. Women, POC, and the developmentally challenged are marginalized by liberty. Don't think for one second that is not the desired outcome of liberty, it is the loudest dog whistle still blown by OWM bigots.

>>42

So Hillary is somehow marginalized by liberty of practicing law and running for a president, instead of being uneducated housewife, a slave to her adulterous husband?

>>43
Who?

>>41
Suck my postmodern cock, which may or may not be a cunt, depending on your point of view.

>>43
Hillary is definitely far more privileged than the average person. She's wealthy, white, and a member of the ruling class. She doesn't have male privilege obviously (note that there is even today a vocal minority that say women cannot be adequate national leaders), but she's so much more powerful than the average person that it really doesn't matter most of the time.

The real problem with liberty is that it's all about "I won't stop you from doing things" rather than "I will make it possible for you to do things". It's good to have, but if ALL you have is liberty, it's not really worth much. If you have no money and no food, liberty is more or less worthless to you. Because really the only "option" you have in that case is to starve, and it's not like anyone is trying to take that option away from you. Liberty is really only worthwhile if you have something to lose.

I will make it possible for you to do things

This is fine if it's mutually beneficial, we call it capitalism.

>>46

The real problem with liberty is that it's all about "I won't stop you from doing things" rather than "I will make it possible for you to do things".

Wow! Really? "I won't stop you from leaving Gulag" is worse than "I will make it possible you will remain in Gulag for the rest of your sorry life"?

So much freedom for collective farm workers, because Mr. Stalin made it possible for them to work for the Glorious Soviet Russia.

>>47
That's not really the definition of capitalism though. Mutually beneficial relationships can also exist in feudalism, communism, etc. And in practice, capitalism is rarely a perfectly balanced mutual relationship, as one side often has more power than the other.

>>48

Wow! Really? "I won't stop you from leaving Gulag" is worse than "I will make it possible you will remain in Gulag for the rest of your sorry life"?

No, of course not. Liberty means "I won't stop you from eating, and I won't stop you from starving". But liberty alone is not sufficient for a good life, you must also have the means to provide for yourself. And some people would gladly give up some of their liberty in exchange for having the means to provide for themselves, if someone is starving, a deal like "I'll give you three meals a day if you agree to do what I say" sounds pretty good to them. This is actually pretty much what employment is, you give up your liberty for say 8 hours a day, and get paid in exchange for that.

So much freedom for collective farm workers, because Mr. Stalin made it possible for them to work for the Glorious Soviet Russia.

Forced labor isn't freedom or liberty. However, one might find forced labor in exchange for food and housing to be preferable to having "freedom" or "liberty" when no work is available.

>>49

That's not really the definition of capitalism though.

Granted it's closer to laissez-faire, but we ain't all hoity toity
round these parts.

Laissez-faire doesn't have anything to do with "mutually beneficial". It just means unregulated markets.

>>51
It"s like you don't even understand basic economic theory. If you assume humans act out of self-interest, then in the absence of external regulations, voluntary exchanges will tend towards being mutually beneficial.

>>52
You are talking about a "tragedy of the commons" type situation?

>>53
Yes, you can clearly see where it was discussed ad nauseum in previous posts.

>>54
Clearly you see these dubs