Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

tfw

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-24 16:55

tfw no qt white washed self hating openly racist ultra conservative hypocritically nationalist asian american gf
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelle_Malkin

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-24 17:24

With the new redesign, she re-enabled comments on her blog, which she said she had disallowed after February 2005 due to a high level of obscene and racist comments.
lol

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-24 17:56

Now they won't be able to say that the only ones hating liberalism and immigration are the white supremacists.

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-24 17:58

Malkin was among the first of several bloggers who questioned the credibility and even the existence of Iraqi police Captain "Jamil Hussein" who had been used as a source by the Associated Press in over 60 stories about the Iraq war. The controversy started in November 2006 when the AP reported that six Iraqis had been burned alive as they left a mosque and that four mosques had been destroyed, citing Hussein as one of its sources. In January 2007, Malkin visited Baghdad, and stated, "the Iraqi Ministry of Interior says disputed Associated Press source Jamil Hussein does exist. At least one story he told the AP just doesn’t check out: The Sunni mosques that as Hussein claimed and AP reported as 'destroyed,' 'torched' and 'burned and blown up' are all still standing. So the credibility of every AP story relying on Jamil Hussein remains dubious."

Fuck yeah, you go, girl. I actually like her despite her being an Asian.

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-24 18:01

Malkin believes that the custom of granting automatic citizenship at birth to U.S.–born children of foreign tourists, temporary foreign workers, and illegal aliens undermines the integrity of citizenship and national security. She argues that the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, "originally intended to ensure the citizenship rights of newly freed slaves and their families after the Civil War, has evolved into a magnet for alien lawbreakers and a shield for terrorist infiltrators and enemy combatants".

+1 point for intelligence. I can't imagine the crookedness of the fucks who made the US immigration laws. Some immigrants fuck on American soil and their child gets citizenship? How retarded is that?

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-24 18:30

>>5
All it takes for a mudslime to get citizenship is to get a tourist visa for his pregnant mudslime girlfriend.

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-24 20:08

>>5
As she mentioned, it is the 14th amendment. At the time, like 1870 or something:
1: Few people would get on a tiny, shitty little boat for three or four months at a time just to defraud the government.
2: Most immigrants were from Europe.
3: Civil rights weren't really a thing, and Asians were denied in California regardless, and Texas was still allowed to kill Mexicans, and LOL, Indians.
4: Jim Crow laws still kept them from voting and doing all the other fun stuff. All it was intended to do at the time was allow them to own land.

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-24 20:15

>>7
So it was justified at the time, but isn't now. It still takes crooked fucks in the government to deny that the law needs to change.

If I ever get anyone pregnant, I will probably advise her to get a tourist visa to US at the expected time of birth so that the child will get free US citizenship, LOL. Invading your country is so fucking easy.

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-24 20:59

>>5,8
Several months prior to Malkin's birth, her parents had immigrated to the United States on an employer-sponsored visa.

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-24 21:04

>>9
Falling for the obvious ad hominem, are you? It's not an argument in any intelligent circles, you know. It only makes me respect this brave woman more, for the sheer willpower that let her see the truth past her personal and ethnic biases.

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-24 21:19

>>10
If your opinions were policy she wouldn't be an American.

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-24 22:17

>>11
*United Statesian

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-25 18:27

>>11
History knows no subjunctive mood.

It would be very easy for her to say: "This wrong is a right because I've profited from it". But she is a much stronger person, and admits the wrong of US immigration laws as a wrong.

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-25 23:16

>>13
History knows no subjunctive mood.
History might know of the subjunctive mood.

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-26 2:57

>>13
If she truly believed it, she would deport herself. She has not. Ergo you are wrong.

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-26 9:29

>>15
She's changing the system from the inside, just like Kurt Cobain and Obama.

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-27 5:11

NO. ERGO YOU ARE WRONG. THAT IS FINAL.

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-27 14:52

>>10
ad hominem
It's a tu quoque at best, though I contest how much of a fallacy it is when in-context, after all, why wouldn't she be deported to begin with? The reasons she could possibly state can probably apply to just about any immigrant currently living on the US, making her particular circumstance relevant to such a discussion.
And she likes to play it as a national security issue as well. If all ethnic minorites are potential terrorists, why leave loose ends with her around? Isn't she an ethnic minority and thus a potential terrorist? Isn't the whole point of massively deporting not leaving any potential threats inside the US?

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-27 16:11

those fucking whites?

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-27 17:21

>>18
Don't be stupid, not all ethnic minorities are potential terrorists. Only sandniggers and other mudslimes. They need to be gassed, but most other groups don't explode do easily, and everyone knows it.

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-27 17:32

>>20
not all ethnic minorities are potential terrorists.
It's every ethnic minority depending on context. During WWII, it was Japanese-Americans (an event which she behemently defends even though it was by all means fucking retarded), now it's muslims. You'd obviously be called idiot even among the conserrvative right if you claim all japs need to be gassed or relocated, but that was the rule back then. Again, she defends this.

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-27 17:36

>>20
>>21
Besides, this is not even my argument. Malkin herself extends this for every anchor baby regardless of their parents' nationality. You tell her not all ethnic minorities are potential minorites, go on.

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-27 18:03

>>22
Optimize your quotes, king of codpieces.

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-27 18:19

Optimize my anus, Lord Uncovered Testicles

Name: Anonymous 2016-07-18 17:51

>>2
lol
lol

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List