Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Questions

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-05 2:29

I am an Internet Anthropologist and have recently discovered this interesting and unique Internet Culture. I have some questions for you.

1. Why do you stylize your quotes as `` '' instead of the normal " which results from shift ' ? What is the origin of this use?

2. What does "san", "kun", and others mean? Obviously they are of Japanese origin and seem to be used more in Japanese animation instead of real life. They seem to be the western equivalent of "bro" or "friend". Why do you use them and not the western equivalents?

(Not necessarily a question as it is a suggestion and command) 3. Write responses to the kind of questions you think I would ask. This is a technique know as "short-cutting" in the sociology world and makes my life and yours much easier.

Thank you for your time.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-05 2:50

SICP

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-05 2:59

1. Because we are FAGGOTS so we use FAGGOT quotes

2. Because it is cuter.

3. No you ask question instead you lazy commie pseudo-cientist bastard.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-05 3:01

1 - ``faggot quotes'' are easier than 66genius quotes99, and are used in SICP, TEX, and in Star Trek.
2 - We do that to feel closer to our favorite 2hus.
3a - Of course not, we are all pure little girls. Stop being lewd.
3b - That is a non-problem blown way out of proportion by the JEWS.
3c - That depends on what you plan to do with it. Use tools appropriate to the task at hand.
3d - Not really.
3e - Yes. Every good /prog/rider has to have at least a working knowlegde of BBCODE
3f - Stupid question, lurk more faggot.
3g - moot, as always, is to blame. I'm sure I could find a greedier, filthier kike if I tried, but I'd be searching for a while.
3h - Lolies!
3i - Breasts are attractive because human males are driven by biological means to select mates that would result in good offspring. Attraction to secondary sexual characteristics is evolution's way of enforcing that. I would agree with you that the crazy over them is overblown, but I attribute that to the fact that they are often considered obscene in the West. Forbidden fruit and all that shit.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-05 4:17

``genius quotes'' are used in SICP not ``faggot quotes''.

>>4
3i
No you faggot, tribal niggers don't have sexual feelings regarding breasts and would think of you as a nutty honky for finding them attractive. Humans aren't driven by obscure, arbitrary, and non-existential "biological means" to selecCHOOSE matPARTNERS and every female has breasts so therefore it would not result in ``good'' offspring but offspring in general as they need breasts for dat milk. Evolution doesn't enforce things. There are sexual characteristics but not ``secondary'' ones and of the characteristics there is personal deviation of them, subjectivity, culture, etc. There also being fetishes that result in features being more attractive than what would be seen as primary or universal. There is no crazy over them.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-05 4:51

>>5
I did not say that there was evolutionary pressure find `good' breast, only that the biological drive to find breasts at all. Its a way of keeping the majority of the population from being a bunch of nasty, depraved child molesters that stupidly tried to mate with that which will not result in offspring. The diminished smell sense in humans caused pheremones to become less important as the brain put more emphasis on visual cues to see the world. As such, males became attracted to bigger breast. The caused a feedback loop as the females evolved larger breast, much disproportionate compared to other primates, just like the presence of completely useless feathers is to a male peacock.

No you faggot, tribal niggers
Excuse me, I thought we were talking about humans.

CHOOSE
Yeah right, caveman dating involved going out of the cave, knocking the bitch in the head, and dragging her in for the rape. There was no partner ship involved in this until very late in the game, and then humans still cooperated in small tribes. Monogamy is a civilized concept.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-05 6:50

>>6
Its a way of keeping the majority of the population from being a bunch of nasty, depraved child molesters that stupidly tried to mate with that which will not result in offspring.

I thought we were talking about humans.
Ditto.

The diminished smell sense in humans caused pheremones to become less important as the brain put more emphasis on visual cues to see the world.
Humans don't have pheremones. The ones who say they do also say they can in fact smell them and that they are ``important''. Yes you need eyes to SEE the world.

only that the biological drive to find breasts at all.
Which doesn't exist.

As such, males became attracted to bigger breast.
And if it did it certainly wouldn't lead to this.

the caused a feedback loop as the females evolved larger breast, much disproportionate compared to other primates, just like the presence of completely useless feathers is to a male peacock.

Regardless of the fact that you made up all this bullshit, I'm sure that the larger breasts of human females is of a ``technical'' reason and not because of what you said.

Excuse me, I thought we were talking about humans.
Again, ditto. nigger

Yeah right, caveman dating involved going out of the cave, knocking the bitch in the head, and dragging her in for the rape.
Wrong. And even primate mating doesn't work like that.

There was no partner ship involved in this until very late in the game
It was at the start of the ``game'' and a part of what made early man so different and special compared to the rest of the animal world.

and then humans still cooperated in small tribes
Yes, RELATIONSHIPS. And so there would be partnerships of some sort (friendship, romantic, etc) though sexually they may of not been monogamous.

Monogamy is a civilized concept.
Civilization is the logical end result of humanity, ``concepts'' are concepts as I said with sexual characteristics.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-05 7:47

>>5
tribal niggers
Shalom!

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-05 8:02

I want this pull your opposition's post into tiny pieces without context shit to stop. If you can only argue against one half of a sentence at a time, you can't argue at all.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-05 8:11

YOU THINK YOURE THOUGH UH ?
I HAVE ONE WORD FOR YOU
THE FORCED INDENTATION OF THE CODE
GET IT ?
I DONT THINK SO
YOU DONT KNOW ABOUT MY OTHER CAR I GUESS ?
ITS A CDR
AND IS PRONOUNCED ``CUDDER''
OK YOU FUQIN ANGERED AN EXPERT PROGRAMMER
THIS IS /prog/
YOU ARE ALLOWED TO POST HERE ONLY IF YOU HAVE ACHIEVED SATORI
PROGRAMMING IS ALL ABOUT ``ABSTRACT BULLSHITE'' THAT YOU WILL NEVER COMPREHEND
I HAVE READ SICP
IF ITS NOT DONE YOU HAVE TO
TOO BAD RUBY ON RAILS IS SLOW AS FUCK
BBCODE AND ((SCHEME)) ARE THE ULTIMATE LANGUAGES
ALSO
WELCOME TO /prog/
EVERY THREAD WILL BE REPLIED TO
NO EXCEPTIONS

Name: Internet Anthropologist 2014-05-05 8:30

>>10
Jesus fucking Christ, i’m out of here

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-05 8:43

>>9
I want this pull your opposition's post into tiny pieces without context shit to stop.
pull your opposition's post into tiny pieces without context
[i]pull your opposition's post into tiny pieces without context[/i]
ISSUE THE FOLLOWING: YOUR ITALICIZED USE OF ITALICIZATION DOES NOT DENY WHAT YOU SAY DUE TO BEING A SMALL PIECE OF THE LARGER SENTENCE YES OR NO?

If you can only argue against one half of a sentence at a time, you can't argue at all.
If you can only argue
ISSUE THE FOLLOWING: DO YOU NOT OR DO YOU DO ASSERT ME TO BE ONLY "ARGUING"?

one half of a sentence at a time
one half
ISSUE THE FOLLOWING: IS PICKING A PART A BAD THING? ACCORDING TO MY INTUITION REGARDING RATIONAL ARGUMENT IT IS NOT. HOW IS IT ONE HALF WHEN IT MAY IN FACT BE A PART, JUST ONE WORD, HALF A WORD? ONE PART SENTENCE AND HALF SENTENCE? FULL SENTENCE AND FULL PARAGRAPH? I DO MANY AND ALL AS NECESSARY.

AT A TIME
ISSUE THE FOLLOWING: HOW CAN I DO IT ALL AT ONCE?

you can't argue at all.
ISSUE THE FOLLOWING: IS ARGUMENTING NOT THE DECONSTRUCTION OF THE OPPOSING ARGUMENT YES OR NO?

AT ALL
ISSUE THE FOLLOWING: HOW CAN IT BE AT ALL WHEN EVEN MY ARGUING MAY BE OF SUBSTANDARD QUALITY TO YOU BUT IT IS ARGUING NONETHELESS AND THEREFORE "AT ALL" WHICH IS A 100% AND NOT LESS.

I want this
ISSUE THE FOLLOWING: IS YOUR ARGUMENT NOT THAT OF EMOTION? IS IT SERIOUS OR NOT?

shit to stop
ISSUE THE FOLLOWING: WHAT POOP DO YOU SPEAK OF? AND HOW DO YOU GET AN INANIMATE OBJECT TO "STOP"?

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-05 9:00

>>9
Holy shit fucking hive mind! I was thinking the exact same thing, but I didn't post about it. It's a remnant of Usenet discussions and it is oh so fitting for this board, but it is also a bad habit. Little can be done about this; our post discussion is like small talk. Small talk can't possibly be like article arguments. You are free to memorize your oppositions post and reply to it as a whole I guess. Just don't be mad when you're picked apart out of context!

Name: so this compiles just fine 2014-05-05 9:59

>>13
back to /reddit/

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-05 10:02

>>9
The tiny pieces are the context, dolt.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-05 10:51

                                ooo$$$$$$$$$$$oo     
                            o$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ooo     
                          o$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$"$$$$$$$oo     
                       o$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$  0 $$$$$$$$$$$$$$oooo     
                      o$$$$"""$$$$$$$$$$$$$oooo$$$$$$$$$$$$$"""     
                    oo$""      "$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$"     
                   o$$          $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$"     
                  o$$            $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$     
                o$$$$             $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$"     
               o$$$$$$oooooooo "                $"     
              $$$$$$$$$$$$$$"     
             $$$$$$$$$$$$$$     
            o$$$$$$$$$$$$$                         o     
           o$$$$$$$$$$$$$                           o     
          o$$$$$$$$$$$$$$                            "o     
         o$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$                             "o     
        o$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$                              $     
       o$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$"                              "     
       $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$                                $     
      o$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$                                $     
      $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$                                 $     
     $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$                                 "     
     $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$                                   $     
    $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$                                    $     
    $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$"                                    $$     
   $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$                                      $o     
   $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$                                      $$     
  $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$                                       $     
  $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$o                                      $$     
 $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$o                                     $$     
 $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$o                                   "$     
 $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$o                                  $     
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$                                 $$     
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$                                $$     
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$                               $$     
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$o                              $$     
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$o                             $$     
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$                             $$     
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$                             $"     
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$                            $$     
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$                            $"     
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$                            $     
 $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$                            o$     
 $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$                            $"     
 $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$"                            $     
 $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$"                             $     
  $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$"                             $$     
  $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$"                              $$     
  $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$                                $$     
   $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$                                o$$     
   $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$                                 $$"     
   "$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$                                    $$                    ¸„„„„„
    $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$                                     $$            „--~*'¯….….'\ 
    "$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$"                                    $$           („-~~--„¸_….,/ì'Ì
     $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$                                    $$        ¸„-^"¯ : : : : :¸-"_/'
     "$$$$$$$$$$$$$"                                   $$  „-^": : : : : : : '   „,-"
      $$$$$$$$$$$$"                   $$* ¯¯¯'^^~-„„-^ '" : : : : : : : :¸  "
      $$$$$$$$$$$"                    $$.:.:.„-^" : : : : : : :  : : : : :„-"
       $$$$$$$$$"                   $$:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: : : :: : :„-^¯
       $$$$$$$$$                 $$.::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. : :: : ¸„„-^¯
       "$$$$$$$"               $$:.' : : '\ : : : : : : „„-~"¯
        $$$$$$$o                $":.:.:: :"-„""*/'ì¸'      
       o$$$$$$$$              $$:.': : : : :"-„ : : :"\                     
       $$$$$$$$$               $$.:.:.: : : : :" : : : : \,    
      o$$$$$$$$$               $ :.: : : : : : : : : : : : 'Ì    
      $$$$$$$$$$              $$ : : : : : : :, : : : : :/      
      "$$$$$$$$$        o$"""-„_::::_„-*__„„~"     
       "$$$$$$$$                          ooooo$$oo     
          ""$$$$$o                oooo$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ooo     
             "$$$$$$ooooooo     """""""""$$$""""$$o   ""

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-05 13:45

which results from shift '
Your problem is that you assume everyone uses the same keyboard layout than you.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-05 13:47

>>14
In which language with which compiler does this compile just fine?

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-05 13:58

>>14
>LEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELELLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELELLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELELLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELELLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELELLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELELLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELELLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELELLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELELLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELELLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELELLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELELLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELELLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELELLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELELLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEL

>LEELELELEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELLE ELELEL LEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELELELELLELELELLELELE
>LEL LE BACK TO LE /REDDIT/ LEEELELLELELEELELELLELELEL
>LE ANGRY /G/RO LELELELELELLE
>LE ANGRY /G/RO FACE >;( LELELELLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELELELELLE
>LE /G/RO TRYING TO FIT IN LELELELLELELELELE LE REDDIT LELELELELELLELELELLELELEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELELLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELELELE
>LEELELLELEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE ELELEL
>LE FORWARD SLASH REDDIT FORWARD SLASH ROFL LEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELEELELELLELELELELLELEL LE FORWARD SLASH /G/RO LELELELE ;D ELLEELEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEL

>LEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEL

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-05 14:35

>>19
Kill yourself.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-05 15:24

>>19
Le lel

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-05 21:29

This thread feels like /prog/ 2012.

Name: Anonymous 2014-05-05 21:48

>>22
That's because many posts here (and /prog/ in general) are mine and I first discovered /prog/ in 2012. I created 2012 and 2013. I created many new /prog/ maymays and the general feel at time and especially now with this smaller /prog/. Now this is the only Internet Culture that I actively participate in.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List