Google Acquires Top Robotics Companies

http://www.engadget.com/2014/06/26/schaft-s-one-robot-google-darpa/

So Google doesn't see software as a sustainable business? Else why bother with diversification?

And why does Google refuse to pursue military contracts, where such toys can find the most use and save lot of lives?

>>1

why does Google refuse to pursue military contracts, where such toys can find the most use and save lot of lives?

Google is an evil corporation, which doesn't care about human lives and freedoms. Most likely Google makes some business with the enemies of America. Like China for example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_by_Google#China

Those stupid toys won't be used in a real war as in a world war fought between first world nations let alone nations in the first place. USA is just currently filled with retard generals who don't know one thing about fighting a war and so must use the shittiest and stupidest and most technological technology to fight stupid goat fucking sandniggers AND STILL LOSE. Alexander the great didn't need drones and the generals of world war two didn’t need drones as well. fucking drones are useless and made by autists who suck at spying (real spying involves the use of your body, you stupid autist go outside already)

>>3

Those stupid toys won't be used in a real war as in a world war fought between first world nations let alone nations in the first place.

These toys can be used in close combat (like cleaning a building from terrorists), because they are immune to small caliber guns and melee weapon. So no bombings and infrastructure destruction need to be involved. They would also make it easier taking combatants alive.

most technological technology to fight stupid goat fucking sandniggers AND STILL LOSE.

Actually, America won every single war in the Middle East with almost non-existing losses. Mostly American casualties are due to human factor, like friendly fire or outright stupidity coupled with safety violations. I.e. that Apache shot down with AK47 due to the absence for bulletproof glass and flying into the range of enemy fire. Wouldn't have happened it was a drone.

The failure came from Obama and liberal defeatist press, which forced America to withdraw from middle east, without cementing the positions there.

>>4
Fuck off you nerd, I want a real war with humans vs humans and not your fantasy hollywood movie shit.

>>5

humans are too pussies to fight, that is why we need robots.

>>6
0/10

Sandniggers aren't going to kill themselves! Oh no wait, they do. I sometimes wonder why I should have to finance more instruments of destruction just to keep a bunch of savages in line. Then I realize that it is the only way for technological advancement that we have left. Corporations hate finding anything that won't pay off in a few quarters, like basic research. Academia would rather piss away money getting a hundred biologist to study the structure of rat dicks and hire 10 more `administrators' than do anything interesting or useful. The so-called `tech sector' is more concerned with plastering ads and social media integration over technologies that were old hen the brogrammers were born. The Jesuits have probably advanced computer science more that Zuckerkike's lauded drain-on-society has.

But, there is always money in building bigger bombs. Google will never out-engineer the MIC once the contracts start rolling in.

>>8
What does MIC stand for? Tell me, need a link. give it. What is the mic?

>>9
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military%E2%80%93industrial_complex

military contracts saving lives

sounds a lot like

therapeutic mustard gas

Do you want therapeutic shrapnel wounds with that?

Sure, militaries can save lives, but that is practically the opposite of the job description by definition..

For the most part, their saving the lives of the blokes next to them, who wouldn't be in danger if they weren't where they are...

And don't give me that ``but the iraqi's need us''
Nobody will touch somalia with a ten foot pole...

>>12
U MENA ACUPUNCTURE

>>13-15
Optimize out your ellipsis, Luke.

>>13

First of all military have to save itself. Every shot enemy spends at a robot is one less shot at US soldier.

>>11

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pax_americana

First of all military have to save itself. Every shot enemy spends at >>18 is one less shot at US soldier.

>>1

Save lives from what?

>>21

from enemy fire.