That's exactly what we need, a computer based on the architecture of the brain. It's like all these AI retards saying in order to have a conscious computer it must emulate the human brain. Fcuking naturalistic empiricist retards. The average human being is fucking idiotic and is full of shit just like you. Very few understand pure maths and most aren't even close to being conscious. Nature has produced arbitrary and deeply flawed designs.
What's next? Instead of a gas-operated automatic firearm, we make on that works by peristalsis? Die in a fire atheist retards.
>>1 If you keep being like this you'll have to slap your own ballsack.
Name:
Anonymous2014-07-18 22:48
Pax Talmudica 2012 : Netanyahu's 'moschiah' is arriving in his flying saucer made in USA. Will the Talmudist-Freemasonic 'moschiah' destroy the 02 Arena in London, as the 'symbolic destruction of Islaam' and the 'Dome of the Rock' in 'Al Aqsa' (Jerusalem), the 4th August 2012? Now what will symbolise the crushing of Obama (the moon allied with white stars in the Talmud-Freemasonry: symbolim of the alliance of Islaam-Christianity) and the USA as detailled in the Talmud-Freemasonry eschatology of the year 5772? The crash of European markets and Wall street in June or September 2012? Only ALLAH swt Knows
Name:
Anonymous2014-07-18 22:53
Pax Talmudica 2012 : Germany is at the heart of the Zionist NWO: the Euro-Reich in the making
an intelligent or conscious or sentient or self-aware or whatever computer is fundamentally impossible and you cannot prove me wrong. you're the naturalist, nature hasn't produced anything. Only God has (created, not produced). can't prove me wrong
This might have been a good thread, but you ruined it by applying your angry theme to it. At least you didn't call anyone ``pseudo-intellectuals'' this time...
I am an atheist and I agree with you. Emulating the human brain's idiocy is not the right path and Eliezer Jewkowsky, Ray Jewzweil and Mentishit are full of shit. Stop hyping the living shit out of your flawed ``fuzzy stochastic'' methods and start doing things the right and precise way.
>>11 So what if they actually prove you wrong and develop a computer that works? Let them hype whatever they like for it is results that matter more than guesswork.
Name:
Anonymous2014-07-19 13:07
>>14 That's precisely why I'm sick of the singularity shit. All hype, no results.
>>15,16 People have been speculating about self-sustaining fusion power for many decades and yet, it still hasn't happened yet. I have no idea about it (I don't keep up on the news of fusion) but I'd guess that there's no inherent reason why fusion power can't happen in the future. All we know is that the current engineering ideas that were tried had failed. Maybe the same thing would happen for the memcomputer - there must first be a theoretical idea and then engineering problems have to be solved to bring the theory into practise. They will hype the idea all they want it's their own responsibility to bring it to reality.
an intelligent or conscious or sentient or self-aware or whatever computer is fundamentally impossible and you cannot prove me wrong. you're the naturalist, nature hasn't produced anything. Only Nothing has (created, not produced). can't prove me wrong