Political Agendas in Programming Communities

How come so many online programming communities are poisoned with feminist/SJW ideology? Take Github, for example. Pulling projects that they deem to be "sexist" or telling people they can't say "he" because that's not gender neutral. Then you have trannies on Gittip asking for money to "contribute" to Github when really they don't even know how to program and ask for money to continue to bitch about sexism in places where it's not even an issue.
Regardless of were you are on the political spectrum, politics don't belong in programming, one way or the other.
Programming should be about programming, not checking privileges and hating white people.

I think everyone here agrees with that. I hate that my refuge from people's bullshit has become the latest target of these crusaders. They're definitely of the "if you're not with us, you're against us" breed.

It's not just programming. It's all part of the far-left SJW fad and programming is just one of its targets. Notice how selective the SJW crowd is with its targets. It doesn't target minorities which are known to mistreat women at a far higher rate that whites. They are only interested in harassing targets when it's easy and fits their narrative. Ask yourself what harm a group nerdy computer programmers have done to women. Feminists think they have an alliance with people of color, which is false. Most of their grudges against men are of minority men and immigrants. No group treats any woman better than intelligent white men. Mudskins, which feminists and SJWs seems to adore so much, are their ultimate downfall.

I think this whole problem is based on parents who fail to socialize kids with members of the opposite gender. They instead let them sit all day watching least-common-denominator asinine drivel perpetuated by Jews. Television and YouTube are the worst causes of this. Then they are surprised when men see women as objects of sex and women who see men as alimony dispensaries. This is why places like /r9k/ exist. Men and women should not fear each other. What is good for one of them is good for the other because they are on the same side. They are meant to work together and support each other. They don't need "movements" to tell them how they are allowed to act towards each other. They just need compassion.

computer programmers r just too nerdy n dum 2 laugh these losers back into the holes they came out of

>>3
Well said. Femitards in general believe that the more of a minority you are, the less oppressive and the more oppressed you are. The logic skills of people who follow SJW ideologies are usually some of the weakest around. It'd be sad if they didn't try to infiltrate everything and make it worse for me, a straight white egalitarian man like myself. When they do that, it causes me to loathe them.

>>5
Exactly. When I see how SJWs behave, I'm reminded of a story I heard in the news about Yugoslavia falling apart. It was said that the people on various sides who wanted war didn't go after each other: instead, they went after and silenced moderates who were trying to stop the war. Eventually, the only prominent figures left all wanted to fight. SJWs are doing the same thing: there's a rape, and they tell men in general that it's their fault. A woman gets harassed (or arguably greeted) by a few black guys and now it's my problem. They know perfectly well that they're blaming and persecuting innocent people. They're doing it to make people feel defensive, to start a fight, which will perpetuate their Wahabi brand of feminism.

On a lighter note, something funny happened in my home country of Canada recently which I think shows how this problem will resolve itself. A couple of Liberal party MPs got suspended for undisclosed allegations of sexual assault. There was a bit of fuss about the fact that there was no open process or chance for them to defend themselves, and then one of the accusers, from a party called the NDP, went to the media and described the "assault." They played sports together, went out for drinks as a group. She and one of the Liberal MPs went back to his place for another drink. They had sex to which she didn't *explicitly* consent. She even gave the guy a condom. And that's it. That's the big fucking deal that our propaganda station, the CBC, has been pissing itself over for weeks, basically calling for an erosion of the rights of the accused. You should hear the fucking empty heads on the radio sounding all confused, since even they aren't crazy enough to call that rape. With crazy people, attention makes them powerful. Ignore them, and they'll eventually screw themselves over.

Feminism is just fight for equal rights for all.
For example, the very fundamental right of special treatment and protection while being a woman. Every human has the right to it. If you are male and want it, simply change your sex!

What's SJW?

Women weren't made to be equal. They have pussies, they bear children and produce milk. Men don't do any of that. How can they be equal? Fucking idiotic tolerasts. Women should be treated as women, that is with respect, love and (when they're pretty) as oblects of sex desire, not as equals. Besides, the real women (not the undersexed psychotic bitches that push feminism) themselves don't want to be treated as equal, they want to be courted and to be paid for in restaurants and driven around by men etc. So when some chick calls for "equal rights", the only proper treatment of her is to give her a good fuck to straighten her out.

>>6
So basically it is now illegal for a white man to have sex with a woman? Feminism is code word for anti-white.

Whenever I see 'her' in technical texts I giggle to myself.

Alyssa P. Hacker is a feminist slut.

>>9
Whenever the topic of feminism or equality arises between me and my fiancee, I am actually the one protecting feminism and equal rights. And she is exactly what the feminists nominally stand for: a liberated, individualistic woman with her own career she chose freely. On top of that, she is a better civil engineer/architect than I am a software engineer, she earns more than me, and arguably is much more beautiful.

Yet she despises them and sees them (even moderates) as freaks and claims that women don't really need equal rights and especially not equal treatment.

Of course, if she lived in the US or Sweden or UK, she would have had trouble getting her hard sciences major being ostracized by the clique for not believing in their religion. Like it is said, feminism is exactly like Islam, except that it is men who wear burqas.

>>8
Social Justice Warrior. It's a tongue-in-cheek term for feminist extremists/female chauvinists.

>>8,14
Stupid Jewish Whores

>>10
Well, the obvious purpose of this stunt was to open a discussion around the idea of making it illegal. I'm not a lawyer, but I believe you would have a very hard time proving rape in a case like that. But for a long time now, the fringe element of feminism has been pushing for laws that make any sex without explicit consent equivalent to rape if the "raped party," presumably the woman, says it is the case. In fact, a similar law is in place in (Sweden?), and is being used to prosecute Julian Assange. He isn't being accused of stalking and violently raping a stranger; he's accused of having sex with someone who essentially changed her mind (presumably at the behest of the CIA) after the fact. And by that standard he's fucked, which demonstrates pretty well what a bad idea such a law is.

>>14
Not only them, but the ones you mentioned are the most illogical and obnoxious

>>14,15
Thanks.

>>16
Why can't a man change his mind and sue her for raping him? Because the woman is always right? Fucking hypocrites.

>>16
The most common scenario will most certainly not be CIA meddling with people. It will be this: a girl and a guy who barely know each other have a decent fuck, drunken or not, doesn't matter. A week later she discusses him with her friends, who for some reason don't like him, for example they think he is a fetishist freak or is into BDSM or some other kind of creep girls usually loathe. So our heroine suddenly has to change her narrative because having sex voluntarily with a person deemed a creep by her groupthink cell is definitely uncool. From now on she will tell everyone that he had raped her despite her protests. Since women show very little compassion towards people they are not sexually attracted to or are friends with, keeping her reputation is much more important to her than not destroying some guy's life for no fucking reason. The guy goes to jail, or his life is otherwise destroyed. The girl caches in on pity and goes to a talk show where she is celebrated for ``speaking up''.
Such is the downfall of the white man indeed.