ASP.NET vs PHP

Which is better?

Just use Cold Fusion.

Java.

PHP is probably worse as a language (I haven't used ASP.NET but I can't imagine it's worse than PHP), but ASP.NET requires a Windows server. So PHP.

>>4
Asp.net uses c#

Python and Django. PHP is as bad as Visual Basic and generally something you only use if you're forced to.

Ruby on Rails

ASP.NET, despite requiring a Windows server.
It's also getting ported to Linux or some shit can't recall, don't care that much.

>>8
Some parts of .NET were being open-sourced, but you could have always ran it in mono if you used Linux anyway.
Also I don't know why requiring a different system for a server affects a language's quality. Things like cost shouldn't affect it that much either.