Cudder is an attention whore who should be ignored. Seriously, don't reply to tripfags.
Name:
Anonymous2015-02-15 22:10
>>6 FreeBSD or PCBSD if you want things to be easy. OpenBSD if you want to play on hard mode.
Name:
Anonymous2015-02-15 22:12
>>8 I just want simple tools that do what I want and is secure. Maybe study the source code too in the future. What do you mean by easy and hard?
Name:
Anonymous2015-02-15 22:20
>>9 Write your own. In fact write your own kernel and operating system while you're at it. It's the only way to know that your system is secure and free.
Name:
Bonkers!UW/WbFWurI2015-02-15 22:32
Hey /prog/. I'm a new tripfag. Please confirm whether or not you approve of my posting here. I'll stay here for many years to come.
Name:
Cudder !MhMRSATORI2015-02-15 22:34
There is an easy way to eliminate Cudder. Everyone becomes Cudder. #1fXzap//
Name:
Cudder!MhMRSATORI2015-02-15 22:41
I farted and little bit of poo came out.
Name:
Cudder!MhMRSATORI2015-02-15 22:48
My plan to conquer /prog/ is to have everybody post as me instead of anonymously
Name:
Anonymous2015-02-15 22:48
>>12-13,15- You can copy xir tripcode, but I'll still be able to tell you apart by writing style.
Name:
Anonymous2015-02-15 23:11
>>10 Why stop there? Implement the entire machine in your favorite HDL.
Name:
Cudder!MhMRSATORI2015-02-15 23:26
>>15 Thank you for your support. Together we will endure this.
Name:
Anonymous2015-02-15 23:26
>>16 Why stop there? Build the processor yourself from silicon you mined.
OpenBSD is designed so simply, and has such excellent documentation and outside resources, that if anything, using OpenBSD seems to be far easier than the other *BSD options
Name:
Anonymous2015-02-15 23:43
>>18 Because my hands shake too much from all the drugs so it's difficult to pull a monocrystal.
>>22 Nice doubles! You got them twice, even. Post number 22 at minute 00. Good job. I really envy those sweet doubles, I wish I could get some myself. Maybe this time... I want them so bad... Maybe this time...
Name:
Anonymous2015-02-16 1:47
NO! I GOT 23! THAT'S NOT A DOUBLE!
I HA TE THIS PLA CE
Name:
Anonymous2015-02-16 1:54
I mean, the first step is to define what you hate about the GNU coreutils and BusyBox. Odds are good that what you hate is inherent to POSIX rather than extensions added by BusyBox (I'm not about to defend GNU), in which case you're just not going to find good replacements no matter how many cargo cultists' pet projects you look at.
Name:
Anonymous2015-02-16 1:56
>>17 Are you actually a misogynist, obsessed anti-cudder faggot? I'm detecting the typical patterns from you.
Name:
Anonymous2015-02-16 3:43
>>1 Define good coreutils Define sucks Everything that already exists performs their jobs.
RMS's guide to writing your own core utils. 1. Download a copy of a OpenBSD core utils. 2. Delete the licences. 3. Apply the GPL licence to the code. 4. Rename the software RMS/GNUcoreutils. 5. For bonus points convince Linux distributions to use it and then start a movement demanding they rename Linux ``GNUwith minor help from Linux''
Congratulations. You have slain the dragon of non-free BSD licensing and have written your own truly free version of coreutils.