/prog/ - Cudder's Anoncoreutils

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-15 21:56

Did something ever result from that?
Are there any good alternatives to gnu's coreutils, busybox, etc? Everything sucks.

Name: Cudder !MhMRSATORI 2015-02-15 22:34

There is an easy way to eliminate Cudder.
Everyone becomes Cudder.
#1fXzap//

Name: Cudder !MhMRSATORI 2015-02-15 22:41

I farted and little bit of poo came out.

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-15 22:48

>>12-13,15-
You can copy xir tripcode, but I'll still be able to tell you apart by writing style.

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-15 23:11

>>10
Why stop there? Implement the entire machine in your favorite HDL.

Name: Cudder !MhMRSATORI 2015-02-15 23:26

>>15
Thank you for your support. Together we will endure this.

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-15 23:26

>>16
Why stop there? Build the processor yourself from silicon you mined.

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-15 23:37

>>8

OpenBSD if you want to play on hard mode

OpenBSD is designed so simply, and has such excellent documentation and outside resources, that if anything, using OpenBSD seems to be far easier than the other *BSD options

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-15 23:43

>>18
Because my hands shake too much from all the drugs so it's difficult to pull a monocrystal.

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-16 0:19

It's still a work in progress, but I like sbase.
http://git.2f30.org/sbase/tree/

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-16 1:00

check 'em dubz

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-16 1:45

>>22
Nice doubles! You got them twice, even.
Post number 22 at minute 00.
Good job.
I really envy those sweet doubles, I wish I could get some myself. Maybe this time... I want them so bad... Maybe this time...

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-16 1:47

NO!
I GOT 23!
THAT'S NOT A DOUBLE!

I HA TE THIS PLA CE

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-16 1:54

I mean, the first step is to define what you hate about the GNU coreutils and BusyBox. Odds are good that what you hate is inherent to POSIX rather than extensions added by BusyBox (I'm not about to defend GNU), in which case you're just not going to find good replacements no matter how many cargo cultists' pet projects you look at.

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-16 1:56

>>17
Are you actually a misogynist, obsessed anti-cudder faggot? I'm detecting the typical patterns from you.

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-16 3:43

>>1
Define good coreutils
Define sucks
Everything that already exists performs their jobs.

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-16 3:55

>>27
A Kant you are not.

Name: RMS Marx Stalin 2015-02-16 4:21

RMS's guide to writing your own core utils.
1. Download a copy of a OpenBSD core utils.
2. Delete the licences.
3. Apply the GPL licence to the code.
4. Rename the software RMS/GNU ^_coreutils.
5. For bonus points convince Linux distributions to use it and then start a movement demanding they rename Linux ``GNU_{^{_{^{_{with minor help from Linux}}}}}''

Congratulations.
You have slain the dragon of non-free BSD licensing and have written your own truly free version of coreutils.

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-16 4:31

>>29
nikita do this with the jews

Name: Cudder !cXCudderUE 2015-02-16 12:39

Last public release:
http://rechan.eu.org/misc/anoncoreutils-20080617-2.tar.bz2

That was nearly 7 years ago. Wow.

Do what you want with them, that's sort of the point...

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-16 13:59

>>31
What do you think of sbase? Do you see anything wrong? Do you have interest in contributing the missing tools?

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-16 14:06

Virus don't click.

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-16 14:48

>>31
Why .bz2?

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-16 18:49

>>31

seven years

Cudder is all talk and no action.

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-16 19:22

Cudder is all talk and one fizzbuzz.

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-18 2:14

I recall writing one of these (false perhaps?) and then some jackass went and rewrote it. Thanks for nothing Cudder

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-18 2:23

"There is no 'I' in 'team', but there is 'us' in 'anus'"
- Anonymous

Name: Cudder !cXCudderUE 2015-02-18 13:34

>>32
Their cat is too big and they seem to use dynamic allocation unnecessarily (look at cut), other than that I don't care.

>>34
Why not?

>>37
All code gets rewritten until it becomes as small and efficient as possible. false is a one-liner:

int main() { return 1; }

Name: Anonymous 2016-08-30 0:09

>>38
Who are you quoting?

>>39
Shouldn't that mean int main(void)? Or is that no longer required by the latest C standard?

Name: Anonymous 2016-08-30 1:49

>>39-40
READ DA STANDARD LOL

Name: Anonymous 2016-08-30 2:40

>>40
Anonymous

Name: Anonymous 2016-08-30 2:51

>>42
But "-Anonymous" was PART of >>38's quote. So apparently >>38 was quoting someone who was quoting Anonymous. But who?

Name: Anonymous 2016-08-30 3:49

>>44
Hey, nice dubs!

Cudder's Anoncoreutils

1 Name: Anonymous 2015-02-15 21:56

12 Name: Cudder !MhMRSATORI 2015-02-15 22:34

13 Name: Cudder !MhMRSATORI 2015-02-15 22:41

15 Name: Anonymous 2015-02-15 22:48

16 Name: Anonymous 2015-02-15 23:11

17 Name: Cudder !MhMRSATORI 2015-02-15 23:26

18 Name: Anonymous 2015-02-15 23:26

19 Name: Anonymous 2015-02-15 23:37

20 Name: Anonymous 2015-02-15 23:43

21 Name: Anonymous 2015-02-16 0:19

22 Name: Anonymous 2015-02-16 1:00

23 Name: Anonymous 2015-02-16 1:45

24 Name: Anonymous 2015-02-16 1:47

25 Name: Anonymous 2015-02-16 1:54

26 Name: Anonymous 2015-02-16 1:56

27 Name: Anonymous 2015-02-16 3:43

28 Name: Anonymous 2015-02-16 3:55

29 Name: RMS Marx Stalin 2015-02-16 4:21

30 Name: Anonymous 2015-02-16 4:31

31 Name: Cudder !cXCudderUE 2015-02-16 12:39

32 Name: Anonymous 2015-02-16 13:59

33 Name: Anonymous 2015-02-16 14:06

34 Name: Anonymous 2015-02-16 14:48

35 Name: Anonymous 2015-02-16 18:49

36 Name: Anonymous 2015-02-16 19:22

37 Name: Anonymous 2015-02-18 2:14

38 Name: Anonymous 2015-02-18 2:23

39 Name: Cudder !cXCudderUE 2015-02-18 13:34

40 Name: Anonymous 2016-08-30 0:09

41 Name: Anonymous 2016-08-30 1:49

42 Name: Anonymous 2016-08-30 2:40

43 Name: Anonymous 2016-08-30 2:51

44 Name: Anonymous 2016-08-30 3:49