Eating Indian food

Suddenly makes me want to program in Java.
Is this normal?

>>39

The number never mattered, anyway.
Regardless of the number, it'd still be a genocide.

So if a random negro murders one Jew, it's still genocide? You've gone bat-shit crazy over your supposed supremacy, Jew.

>>40
I've never seen any Torah scholar placing any undue importance to the six million number, the stupid prophecy is blabbered only by holocaust deniers. I read one of the newspaper articles from >>31, specifically The Sun. Luckily for me, someone went through the hassle of digitizing that issue and putting it online for free. The six-million quote is taken completely out of context, no doubt it's the same thing for the rest of the articles. So you give me flack for "blindly believing" a well-documented event, but you simply accept that the event is the product of a vast conspiracy because someone told you online that it is so, without even doing a shitty google search?

The newspaper page in question http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030272/1915-06-06/ed-1/seq-49/

>>41
If the intention was getting rid of all the jews of the world, then yes. What does it matter, anyway. The lowest estimated number by deniers is certainly not one, what a shitty non-sequitur.

>>43

The lowest estimated number by deniers is certainly not one

Oooh, breaking news! People die in wars and in prisoner camps. They die no matter what their ethnicity is, so Jews would inevitably die during WWII in any case. This certainly proves "the Holocaust" and also makes them the Superior People that everyone should care about even though other nations suffered much greater casualties! God, you are stupid.

>>42
How about those newspapers from all over the Western world? Isn't that undue placement of importance on the number "6 million" in connection with the supposed persecution of Jews who supposedly deserve everyone's sympathy and money donations?

The six-million quote is taken completely out of context

You must be either reading with your anus, or trying to twist the truth. Read the relevant quote again:

Six million Jows. one-half of
th Jewish people throughout the
world, are belns persecuted, hounded,
humiliated, tortured, starved.

The number 6 million is clearly being used as a magical whining number for eliciting undue sympathy towards the Jewry.

>>42

a well-documented event

I can document the fact of violent coitus with your mother right in this post. But events need to be proven, not documented. You might learn this one day when you go to high school.

>>45
Fine then, I'll hop on my time machine and document it on holocube. Oh wait, documenting doesn't prove anything. Guess you'll have to be there.

>>44

People die in wars and in prisoner camps.

Again with the non-sequiturs? Oh, honey, when will you learn to follow a line of thought without deviating all over the place like a stupid child?

How about those newspapers from all over the Western world?

What you posted was very evidently nothing with what the post stated:

Six million Jews are being persecuted in Russia.

vs

Six million Jews are being persecuted worldwide on their respective countries

It's very evidently misleading. What's more, it shows that the "quotes" are not verbatim, and they aren't even headlines. Hell, some of those are so spurious they don't even exist. Here's me trying to look for the word "Jews" on the New York Times archive for October 8 1918, http://query.nytimes.com/search/sitesearch/#/Jews/from19181008to19181008/, no results. How many of those "quotes" even exist? Why would you even repost pieces of information you yourself have not verified? Are you honestly this stupid?
That a number of authors decided to round the number of jews living under the former Russian Empire (historically the biggest settlement of Jews) to six million and that such a number happens to match the approximated number of holocaust victims only manages to prove that there were really that many jews to begin with. Your retarded claims also require to deny that Pogroms in the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union existed, how many more pieces of known history do you want to change to fit your narrative? Can you even imagine all the historical facts that need to be denied in order to support it?

>>45

You might learn this one day when you go to high school.

I'm positive that school might be one of those places where they defend the existence of the holocaust, you would know that if you hadn't dropped out. What's more, you're the one believing on a worldwide conspiracy dating literally decades without a single piece of evidence. Not one.

This thread went from curry to Jews.

All things go to jews.

>>37
You did not read the comments it looks like.

>>47

Here's me trying to look for the word "Jews" on the New York Times archive for October 8 1918, http://query.nytimes.com/search/sitesearch/#/Jews/from19181008to19181008/, no results

That's because they changed it.

>>51
Thanks for bumping the thread with your shitty "observation".

>>52
Kike detected.

>>50
No, I did read them. They were quite pleasant. What exactly did you dislike about them?

>>54
Read them again.

>>55
They're not that pleasant.