Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

Eating Indian food

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-08 2:21

Suddenly makes me want to program in Java.
Is this normal?

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-08 3:18

Spicy food is known to boost one's mental function for a short period of time, presumably leading programmers to an understanding of more demanding programming languages.

Unfortunately, the effect seems to be reversed for homosexuals, who actually experience a decline in mental function, which could lead to one choosing a more terrible language, such as Java.

I believe that this observation clearly exposes >>1-suke's true sexual nature.

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-13 2:50

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-13 2:56

Admin-sama-kike, please ban >>3.

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-13 3:02

YOU GOTTA BAN >>3

THAT IS JUST RACIST

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-13 10:50

>>1
You mean Haskell. You can't curry natively in Java.

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-13 14:29

>>6
Curry is British.

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-13 14:34

They sure eat a lot of curry in anime

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-13 23:09

>>7
No, curry with gravy dumped on it is British.

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-13 23:12

>>6
public class Currier<ARG1, ARG2, RET> {
public interface CurriableFunctor<ARG1, ARG2, RET> {
RET evaluate(ARG1 arg1, ARG2 arg2);
}

public interface CurriedFunctor<ARG2, RET> {
RET evaluate(ARG2 arg);
}

final CurriableFunctor<ARG1, ARG2, RET> functor;

public Currier(CurriableFunctor<ARG1, ARG2, RET> fn) { functor = fn; }

public CurriedFunctor<ARG2, RET> curry(final ARG1 arg1) {
return new CurriedFunctor<ARG2, RET>() {
public RET evaluate(ARG2 arg2) {
return functor.evaluate(arg1, arg2);
}
};
}

public static void main(String[] args) {
Currier.CurriableFunctor<Integer, Integer, Integer> add
= new Currier.CurriableFunctor<Integer, Integer, Integer>() {
public Integer evaluate(Integer arg1, Integer arg2) {
return new Integer(arg1.intValue() + arg2.intValue());
}
};

Currier<Integer, Integer, Integer> currier
= new Currier<Integer, Integer, Integer>(add);

Currier.CurriedFunctor<Integer, Integer> add5
= currier.curry(new Integer(5));

System.out.println(add5.evaluate(new Integer(2)));
}
}

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-18 16:38

By the time you finish reading this post, you will have checked my dubs

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-18 18:35

>>5
Racism is not something bad.

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-18 21:24

>>3
Ikekd

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-18 21:51

>>13
What are you trying to say? I kiked? Does that involve inhaling zyklon b and going in an oven?

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-21 11:34

>>3
Are those green bubbles?

smh

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-21 12:52

>>14
It involves shoving zykon b into your bumhole

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-22 13:39

>>14
Believer in the 6 million detected.

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-22 21:48

>>14
It involves having higher average IQ than white people, making lots of money, ruling the entire Earth and making goyim mad and jealous.

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-23 1:39

>>17
Are you denying that 6 billion were killed in the holocaust?

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-23 1:49

>>19
It's so offensive that he is trying to deny the systematic massacre of 6 trillion Chosen Ones.

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-23 2:14

>>20
It's especially offensive because my grandmother was only 7 when she became one of the 6 quadrillion victims of the holocaust.

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-23 2:43

>>18
Sounds fun.

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-23 2:44

>>21
Sounds fun.

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-23 11:44

That's not funny, my uncle died in a concentration camp.

He was a filthy jew

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-23 12:34

>>19
Are you implying that the qabbalistic number "6 million" taken from a book way before WWII has any relation to the actual number of killed Jews?

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-23 12:39

Basically, in the Hebrew magic book there's a letter "Vav" missing in the passage about entering the Jewish state (Israel), and the qabbalists took that to mean that Jews will enter Israel missing 6 (million) which will be their price for founding their nation. They started whining about 6 million persecuted/murdered/starving/etc Jews way before Adolf Hitler even came to power, as is evidenced by newspapers and books from the first half of the XXth century. It was their magic number for whining. It's no coincidence, then, that after WWII the number of killed Jews "turned out" to be none other than 6 million, and qabbalistic Jews may even believe that it reflects reality, but do you believe them? Do you believe that reality conforms to some magic number arbitrarily taken from a magic book?

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-23 13:49

>>25,26
Nice conspiracy theory.

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-23 17:59

>>27
Except that it's not.

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-23 18:26

Nice constipation theory.

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-23 19:21

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-23 19:26

1)The Sun New York June 6 1915 Six million Jews are being persecuted in Russia.
2)New York Times Oct 8 1918 6,000,000 Jews need help , fund to rebuild Jewry.
3)New York Times Sep 8 1919 Ukrainian Jews aim to stop pogroms , Six million in peril.
4)New York Times Nov 12 1919 Jews worst victims of war sad plight of 6,000,000 Jews
5)Atlanta Constitution Feb 23 1920 Fund needed for Six Million Jews in eastern Europe and Palestine.
6)New York Times May 7 1920 Six Million Jews suffering starvation in East Europe.
7)New York Times Jul 20 1921 Save Six Million in Russia , massacre threatens all Jews.
8)Montreal Gazette Dec 29 1931 Six Million Jews face starvation in south eastern Europe.
9)New York Times May 31 1936 Intolerable suffering of millions of Jews in the European holocaust (1936 before the war!?)
10)New York Times Feb 23 1938 Six Million!!!! Jews deprived of protection in central Europe.
etc etc

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-23 19:30

ITT your favorite Touhou characters and why you hate kikes.

My favorite Touhou character is Kogasa Tatara and I hate kikes because of their shameless exploitation of the Holohoax, which they blew out of proportion thanks to the falsified reports that they forged in many of the post-war kangaroo courts. It has been over 60 years ago, yet you're still using it as an excuse to get a free pass on EVERYTHING: the insane manipulation of media, the lobbying, the atrocities you're committing against the Palestinians in the lands you STOLE thanks to your Jew friends in the United Kingdom.
Everyone knows what you're doing and you've been doing in these 50 years, the only reason this spiral of silence still exists today is because you'd be called a Nazi, an anti-semite, you'de be ostracized from society.
Can you imagine a Kurd terrorist being excused because 90 years ago the Ottomans attempted to kill his people? It would be inexcusable, but then again Jews have their friends in Hollywood who love to line their pockets by tugging at goyim's heartstrings.
I'm fucking sick and tired of your slimeball tactics. If you really have the support of people in the western hemisphere then are you still wasting no effort to influence and manipulate public opinione, kikes?

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-24 17:57

>>26
The current widely accepted number of jewish holocaust victims stands at 5.7 million. You'd think Jews being so anal to the point of plotting a worldwide conspiracy to fulfill a fringe prohpecy would lose their shit over the not-quite-6 million number.

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-25 7:53

>>33

seems close enough

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-25 9:32

>>33
Widely accepted by whom? Wikipedia still says >muh 6 gorillion

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-25 19:36

>>30
The kiketube comments are painful to read.

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-26 18:17

>>36
What's so painful? Seemed nice to me.

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-26 18:20

>>33
Census reports of nations that were occupied during the war proved that the figure of jews in total in Europe was way below 3m but show 'them' or the world the figures and you're a holocaust denier or an anti-semite. Incidentally, none of these 'cracker jews' were bonafide articles. They were Turkish descendants. The Nazi's would've needed more manpower to slaughter the jews on a daily basis compared to fighting a war on 2-3 fronts.

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-26 18:33

>>38
Census reports of nations that were occupied during the war proved that the figure of jews in total in Europe was way below 3m but show 'them' or the world the figures and you're a holocaust denier or an anti-semite
Because those numbers are pulled straight from IHR's collective anus. Holocaust deniers can't even get their numbers straight. Sometimes it's as low as 300,000. Sometimes the number goes up to 4 million. Of course, all those numbers contradict the Nazi's own Wansee Protocol, which clearly states the number of jews in occupied Europe was of 11 million jews circa 1942. The number never mattered, anyway. At best, it's a poor attempt to derail the conversation, at worst, a deliberate, dishonest attempt to strike doubt into the one of the most documented events in human history. As if the huge inconsistencies among holocaust deniers themselves wasn't suspicious enough. Regardless of the number, it'd still be a genocide.

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-26 18:56

>>39
The truth is, we don't know and won't know the answer. But blindly believing some qabbalictic number out of Tora won't get us any closer to truth.

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-26 19:04

>>39
The number never mattered, anyway.
Regardless of the number, it'd still be a genocide.
So if a random negro murders one Jew, it's still genocide? You've gone bat-shit crazy over your supposed supremacy, Jew.

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-26 19:06

>>40
I've never seen any Torah scholar placing any undue importance to the six million number, the stupid prophecy is blabbered only by holocaust deniers. I read one of the newspaper articles from >>31, specifically The Sun. Luckily for me, someone went through the hassle of digitizing that issue and putting it online for free. The six-million quote is taken completely out of context, no doubt it's the same thing for the rest of the articles. So you give me flack for "blindly believing" a well-documented event, but you simply accept that the event is the product of a vast conspiracy because someone told you online that it is so, without even doing a shitty google search?

The newspaper page in question http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030272/1915-06-06/ed-1/seq-49/

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-26 19:10

>>41
If the intention was getting rid of all the jews of the world, then yes. What does it matter, anyway. The lowest estimated number by deniers is certainly not one, what a shitty non-sequitur.

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-26 19:25

>>43
The lowest estimated number by deniers is certainly not one
Oooh, breaking news! People die in wars and in prisoner camps. They die no matter what their ethnicity is, so Jews would inevitably die during WWII in any case. This certainly proves "the Holocaust" and also makes them the Superior People that everyone should care about even though other nations suffered much greater casualties! God, you are stupid.

>>42
How about those newspapers from all over the Western world? Isn't that undue placement of importance on the number "6 million" in connection with the supposed persecution of Jews who supposedly deserve everyone's sympathy and money donations?

The six-million quote is taken completely out of context
You must be either reading with your anus, or trying to twist the truth. Read the relevant quote again:

Six million Jows. one-half of
th Jewish people throughout the
world, are belns persecuted, hounded,
humiliated, tortured, starved.

The number 6 million is clearly being used as a magical whining number for eliciting undue sympathy towards the Jewry.

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-26 19:29

>>42
a well-documented event
I can document the fact of violent coitus with your mother right in this post. But events need to be proven, not documented. You might learn this one day when you go to high school.

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-26 20:43

>>45
Fine then, I'll hop on my time machine and document it on holocube. Oh wait, documenting doesn't prove anything. Guess you'll have to be there.

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-26 21:02

>>44
People die in wars and in prisoner camps.
Again with the non-sequiturs? Oh, honey, when will you learn to follow a line of thought without deviating all over the place like a stupid child?

How about those newspapers from all over the Western world?
What you posted was very evidently nothing with what the post stated:
Six million Jews are being persecuted in Russia.
vs
Six million Jews are being persecuted worldwide on their respective countries
It's very evidently misleading. What's more, it shows that the "quotes" are not verbatim, and they aren't even headlines. Hell, some of those are so spurious they don't even exist. Here's me trying to look for the word "Jews" on the New York Times archive for October 8 1918, http://query.nytimes.com/search/sitesearch/#/Jews/from19181008to19181008/, no results. How many of those "quotes" even exist? Why would you even repost pieces of information you yourself have not verified? Are you honestly this stupid?
That a number of authors decided to round the number of jews living under the former Russian Empire (historically the biggest settlement of Jews) to six million and that such a number happens to match the approximated number of holocaust victims only manages to prove that there were really that many jews to begin with. Your retarded claims also require to deny that Pogroms in the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union existed, how many more pieces of known history do you want to change to fit your narrative? Can you even imagine all the historical facts that need to be denied in order to support it?

>>45
You might learn this one day when you go to high school.
I'm positive that school might be one of those places where they defend the existence of the holocaust, you would know that if you hadn't dropped out. What's more, you're the one believing on a worldwide conspiracy dating literally decades without a single piece of evidence. Not one.

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-26 21:32

This thread went from curry to Jews.

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-26 22:16

All things go to jews.

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-26 22:25

>>37
You did not read the comments it looks like.

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-27 18:14

>>47
Here's me trying to look for the word "Jews" on the New York Times archive for October 8 1918, http://query.nytimes.com/search/sitesearch/#/Jews/from19181008to19181008/, no results
That's because they changed it.

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-27 19:11

>>51
Thanks for bumping the thread with your shitty "observation".

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-27 19:51

>>52
Kike detected.

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-27 19:56

>>50
No, I did read them. They were quite pleasant. What exactly did you dislike about them?

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-27 21:26

>>54
Read them again.

Name: Anonymous 2015-08-27 22:06

>>55
They're not that pleasant.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List