Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Google Foobar code challenges

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-28 4:41

anyone else here done this challenge? I just finished level 5 and it's saying I'm done there are no more challenges.

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-28 4:54

I googled it and only found a page that told me to google it to log in. I don't want to solve more impossible problems so I lost interest.

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-28 5:17

>>2
No you have to get invited to it. I guess you have to search a high volume of programming related search queries to activate it. When you do, the normal Google search result page has a popup saying "we have a challenge for you". After you open the invite, it leads you to a web based/JS "unix" terminal that has a folder with a bunch of code challenges in .txt files. You write the solution (before the timer runs out), run the "tests," and then if it passes you get to move on to the next challenge.

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-28 8:33

>>3
Regularly search for assembly, Lips and functional programming related stuff, but never triggered it. Guess it is targeted at JavaScript people. So doubt there will be anything entertaining.

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-28 8:40

>>4
JavaScript
people
that's an oxymoron

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-28 11:14

Google isn't my default search engine, and its cookies and javascript are blocked for the few times that the other engines can't find results as well and I try the big G.

Google is just self-selecting for people with no qualms about people leaving their ass open for security or privacy problems. Can't have them new recruits rocking the boat, after all.

Name: Cudder !cXCudderUE 2016-06-28 11:19

>>6
+1

>>3
In other words, they're selecting those who wouldn't sensibly think "WTF? Did my machine/browser just get pwned?" if something like that happened to them.

Then again, if on the very slim chance that I had JS enabled and it happened to me, I'd probably get the page source and reverse-engineer/crack it... I wouldn't be surprised if everything was client-side, including those "tests" and their results.

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-28 13:40

>>3
I bet their algorithm disgregards cis-white-males or people that searchs /prog/.

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-28 19:54

>>7
I'd probably get the page source and reverse-engineer/crack it

Wow what a e/g/in 1337 hacker

I wouldn't be surprised if everything was client-side

It isn't.

including those "tests" and their results

It isn't.

Honestly I would recommend that you of all people try to do these challenges. The harder ones on level 5 will show you that there's more to computing than micro-optimizing fibs in ASM, and most importantly, that you're not as good a programmer as you thought you were.

>>4
The accepted languages for the challenges are FIOC and Java. JavaShit isn't involved except in the fancy interface to view the questions.

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-28 20:29

Honestly I would recommend that you of all people try to do these challenges
We can't though, none of us has been invited and we are never going to be.

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-28 20:51

>>10
check em

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-28 20:53

>>11
Dubs checker: v0.14 Input:11 Result:OK
____________
< Well done! >
------------
\ ^__^
\ (oo)\_______
(__)\ )\/\
||----w |
|| ||

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-29 16:08

>>3
How about you post the challenges here you fucking retard

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-30 9:34

>>9
Is this really how you respond to a corporation making it obvious it has been monitoring your intellectual development? With enthusiasm? And you expect every person to react in the same way?

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-30 16:02

Check em

Name: Anonymous 2016-07-01 19:30

So ur with ur honey and yur making out wen the phone rigns. U anser it n the vioce is “wut r u doing wit my daughter?” U tell ur girl n she say “my dad is ded”. THEN WHO WAS PHONE?

Name: Anonymous 2016-08-09 2:05

I got it after searching for "Go To Statement Considered Harmful"

Name: Anonymous 2016-08-09 2:23

OP here. It's a scam. They never even emailed me about my performance. I guess it was mildly interesting.

Name: Anonymous 2016-08-09 10:46

disgusting

Name: Anonymous 2016-08-09 11:24


Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List