/prog/ - Why web 2.0 shit sucks

Name: Anonymous 2016-08-04 23:31

Let's use an immature standard and young libs for production servers

https://auth0.com/blog/critical-vulnerabilities-in-json-web-token-libraries/

Go run this one-liner that totally won't fuck your shit up to install a shitty package manager that works like shit anyways.

https://scott.arciszewski.me/blog/2014/08/dont-use-composer-php

God damn it, why arent there any good JWT libs for C?

Name: Anonymous 2016-08-05 0:14

Why would anyone use JSON instead of sexpressions? JSON doesn't even have comments!

Name: Anonymous 2016-08-05 0:26

Aren't we on Web3.0 yet?

Name: Anonymous 2016-08-05 3:07

Javashit instead of sxheme,

It took them d3cades to.invent... they would have had sexps from day one.if it were scheme.

So disappointing. Why do coders have terrivle.taste in pls and.always makw things worse than they should be

Name: Anonymous 2016-08-05 5:37

http://www.biwascheme.org/index.html

Name: Cudder !cXCudderUE 2016-08-08 11:01

>>2
Why would anyone use JSON instead of ASN.1? At least it's not XML...

The "modern Web2.0 way" to transfer a file is to base64 encode it, put that base64 into a JSON, then wrap that JSON in HTTP request only to have the server do the opposite on the other side. Instant 33%+ bandwidth waste. How about opening a TCP socket and sending the file directly with a tiny binary header? Retards.

Name: Anonymous 2016-08-08 11:41

>>6
stop posting with a name or fuck off

Name: Anonymous 2016-08-08 17:12

The "modern Web2.0 way" to transfer a file is to base64 encode it, put that base64 into a JSON, then wrap that JSON in HTTP request only to have the server do the opposite on the other side.

To anyone who thinks this is a joke: it's not. I had to do this at work recently.

Also the entire shit was written in an in-house framework built on top of AngularJS which boxed every type in more JSON. So instead of sending "foo" I have to send { type: "string", data: "foo" } to get a string to the other side.

Name: Anonymous 2016-08-08 18:45

The best thing about web programming is there's no state to mutate.

Name: Anonymous 2016-08-08 21:03

>>9
What? There's definitely state to mutate in web programming.

Name: Anonymous 2016-08-08 22:57

>>9
The best thing about your mom is mutating her cunt.

Name: Anonymous 2016-08-09 0:29

>>8
There's a programming game called Screeps where they rent out CPU time to run your critters' AI code that you have to write.

Problem is: it's written in node.js. No fucking wonder the prices for CPU time are that fucking expensive, my god.

Some faggot had the audacity to recommend me a fucking C to JS compiler for this shit.

Name: Anonymous 2016-08-09 1:02

>>1
How exactly do you think immature standards and libraries become mature? It happens when people actually use them and contribute to its development.

Name: Anonymous 2016-08-09 1:46

>>12
Why exactly is node so slow? Is it just because it's interpreted, or is it noticeably worse than other interpreted languages?

Name: Anonymous 2016-08-09 2:57

>>14
it's javashit. that's all you need to know. even fibs in javashit takes a noticeably long time.

Name: Anonymous 2016-08-09 5:16

>>12

Some faggot had the audacity to recommend me a fucking C to JS compiler for this shit.

If you have to run on a javashit platform, you can do much, much worse than Emscripten. And you can actually use whatever language you want as long as it can output LLVM. It far outperformed the other compiler-to-javascript languages when I had to use it, but that was a couple years ago and for a different company.

Name: Anonymous 2016-08-09 5:56

>>8

I believe it, the people at my job who keep proposing nodejs have trouble understanding "single-threaded". the people proposing mongodb don't know what ACID means.

we run an HR corporation, we're charge of paying out the wages. the world sucks.

Name: Anonymous 2016-08-09 7:17

>>17
Not all database applications require ACID. I presume your one actually required ACID transactions.

Name: Anonymous 2016-08-10 16:41

prime GET

Name: Anonymous 2016-08-11 21:33

vulnerable
dangerous
no way to safely

Security is overrated.

Name: Anonymous 2016-08-11 21:35

>>20
Just some asshat hackers trying to sell their "knowledge" of how to "protect" your system.

Name: Anonymous 2016-08-11 22:34

_{(this space left intentionally unsecured)}

Name: Anonymous 2016-08-12 22:51

>>22
Nice dubs. Too bad I just hacked them HEHEHE :^)

Why web 2.0 shit sucks

1 Name: Anonymous 2016-08-04 23:31

2 Name: Anonymous 2016-08-05 0:14

3 Name: Anonymous 2016-08-05 0:26

4 Name: Anonymous 2016-08-05 3:07

5 Name: Anonymous 2016-08-05 5:37

6 Name: Cudder !cXCudderUE 2016-08-08 11:01

7 Name: Anonymous 2016-08-08 11:41

8 Name: Anonymous 2016-08-08 17:12

9 Name: Anonymous 2016-08-08 18:45

10 Name: Anonymous 2016-08-08 21:03

11 Name: Anonymous 2016-08-08 22:57

12 Name: Anonymous 2016-08-09 0:29

13 Name: Anonymous 2016-08-09 1:02

14 Name: Anonymous 2016-08-09 1:46

15 Name: Anonymous 2016-08-09 2:57

16 Name: Anonymous 2016-08-09 5:16

17 Name: Anonymous 2016-08-09 5:56

18 Name: Anonymous 2016-08-09 7:17

19 Name: Anonymous 2016-08-10 16:41

20 Name: Anonymous 2016-08-11 21:33

21 Name: Anonymous 2016-08-11 21:35

22 Name: Anonymous 2016-08-11 22:34

23 Name: Anonymous 2016-08-12 22:51