Name: Anonymous 2013-10-21 7:13
1 get
using different pronouns depending on whether a person has a dick or a cunt is fucking stupidI need this to know if I can masturbate to something. I'm sure as hell I'm not jerk it off to a dick, and I jerk it to Touhous. Why not call them ``she''?
Why not have different pronouns based on skin or hair colour?Those don't provide any advantage over the basic gendered pronouns. Assuming you don't come from Tumblr, pronouns give you an image of what the other person might be able to do. ``She assembled an engine'' or ``he wore a pink skirt'' will provoke different answers than those provoked by the same sentences with swapped pronouns. Sure, those sentences may have a defined truth value in some liberal countries where males are faggots and you can't do anything about it, but we're not considering that case here.
I need this to know if I can masturbate to something. I'm sure as hell I'm not jerk it off to a dick, and I jerk it to Touhous. Why not call them ``she''?That's a fairly petty excuse to justify an entire system of prejudice.
Assuming you don't come from Tumblr, pronouns give you an image of what the other person might be able to do. (...) Sure, those sentences may have a defined truth value in some liberal countries where males are faggots and you can't do anything about it, but we're not considering that case here.And when the image doesn't fit your view of reality, shaming and homophobia. Nice.
Before you accuse me of being a sexist, I'm not telling all women not to assemble engines or telling all men to wear pants, but if you don't think those situations are unlikely, you should consult some statistics and confirm they're indeed rare.Of course they are; my point is that they ought not to be. Given that a person knows how to assemble engines, the probability that that person is female should be approximately 1/2.
but the same can't be said about people of different colors because of mixed races and Michael Jackson.First you justify gender by saying it gives you an idea most of the time (and you acknowledge there are non-negligible exceptions), then you use the exact same argument against using racial pronouns/qualifiers/slurs.
I hate SJWs too, but you don't have to go so far as to lose a useful feature of a language.I don't think we have SJWs for the same reason. The relevant reason here for my hatred of them is that instead of doing away with all the gender bullshit (and thus simplifying society by a lot), they're adding on top of it (like Stroustrup on C) and making it even more of a defining trait of a person. You seem to hate them because they're threatening your gender binary worldview.
Given that a person knows how to assemble engines, the probability that that person is female should be approximately 1/2.Typical pseudointellectual atheist retard. This is not some place where God flips a coin and chooses to endow you with the ability of assembling engines. You should try going outside, counting the number of female engine assemblers, compare it to the total of engine assemblers and draw a conclusion from that.
Why not have different pronouns based on skin or hair colour?Sounds nice! jews will be called אדון and goyim will be called עבד!
FUCKY FU CK FUCKY FU CK FU CK FUCKYO FU CK
OU YO UF OU YOU YOUF UF UC YO UF
FUCKY UC KY FU FUC UC KY OU UC KY
OU OUFUCK CKYOU KY OU KY FUCKYO OUFUCK Given that a person knows how to assemble engines, the probability that that person is female should be approximately 1/2.I'm sorry but that's not how probability works. Please read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernoulli_trial
First you justify gender by saying it gives you an idea most of the time (and you acknowledge there are non-negligible exceptions), then you use the exact same argument against using racial pronouns/qualifiers/slurs.That's exactly my point. It makes sense to use gendered pronouns, but it doesn't make much sense to use racial pronouns. While the correlation between biological gender and daily life is strong, it's very hard to tell what a hair/skin color says about you.
And when the image doesn't fit your view of reality, shaming and homophobia. Nice.I'm afraid we don't share the same point of view.
You seem to hate them because they're threatening your gender binary worldview.
I haven't seen anything of atheism yet hereYou have to be kidding me.
atheist conservatives are the worstDo these even exist?
male theist feminist shotgun owner you stupid virgin sexist loser*grabs cock* *cocks shotgun*
Your correlations are baseless and anti-human.No, no, the correlations are (probably) correct. It is the interpretation that is rather naive, silly, and ``anti-human''.
You assume your arbitrarily selected statistics studies on whatever mra/pua sites mean anything regarding reality or actual ability.Wait... now I'm confused, what correlations are we talking about? I'm such a baka.
Male/female as sex, no gender. deal with it forever-virgin nobody.Wait, are we... actually in perfect agreement on something?
Whatever masculine males would never accept you anyways.I find a perverse pleasure in this line. In particular, it is only effective (at somewhat hurting one's feelings) if directed at a male with a strong belief in the gender binary.
Stay in your basement but it isn't like you can ever leave it in the first place.
It is the interpretation that is rather naive, silly, and ``anti-human''.It is only anti-human if you infer a natural ordering (and thus superiority/inferiority) from it. Inherent differences are no problem, so I don't know why you and your kind keeps turning it into one. Diverse systems tend to be more resilient, actually.
Inherent differencesIt is utterly unsurprising to notice statistically significant differences with respect to genders in a society of humans who learn almost everything from their environment and where the gender binary is almost law, and large inherent differences are not required to explain them.
Inherent differences are no problem, so I don't know why you and your kind keeps turning it into one.If it weren't for gender, it might very well be that the inherent differences are very small compared to the standard deviation anyway.
Diverse systems tend to be more resilient, actually.Rejecting gender and thus de-correlating things like ``being female'' and ``assembling engines'' only yields more diversity (since now instead of having only males who assemble engines and females who knit, you have males who assemble engines, females who assemble engines, males who knit, and females who knit).
Tendencies like that have been found in one day oldscitation needed
those one day olds in that study but not all studiesOr what I actually mean is not all one day olds which these idiotic professors and their studies on small populations or college students think they mean anything regarding 7 billion humans.
I like how you expect ``scientific basis' to be taken as the truth.Stop pulling things out of your ass and read properly. If you want something to be taken seriously and spent resources on, you better have a good reason to believe it might be true. I'm just hearing excuses and shitty insults so far. What suggests that all psychological differences between men and women are nurtured?
Tendencies like thatWhat tendencies are you even going on about as the poster made no mention of any particular set of tendencies
All differences in that area are statistical,What are you even trying to say here? I'm question the value of those statistics.
baron-cohenFuck off with your kike and autistic brains
though I'm sure you'll find something within minutes that has reasonable doubts about one point which totally invalidates everything ever against your view.ditto, faggot
what suggests that all psychological differences between men and women are nurtured?What suggests they aren't? What suggests they are? What suggests they are all nature? What suggests they aren't all nature? What suggests they are half and half? What suggests that all human males and females have such differences or that the average within a 7 billion+ population could ever be figured out? Hmm, probably too much for your ivory tower social-``scientists''. What do you personally get out of your beliefs or are you just an autistic libertarian with a desire to be ``correct''?
Fuck off with your kike and autistic brainsI wished IHBT, but seeing how much effort you put into this shit, you are either dead serious and retarded or ultimately trolled yourself.
Still nothing about those one day olds, I'm sure you made that one up.
What do you personally get out of your beliefs or are you just an autistic libertarian with a desire to be ``correct''? I am not this ``ey person'' you speak of and the abolition of gendered pronouns would be fitting for such a technical language as English. Your social beliefs mean nothing regarding linguistics. The only manly thing about you is the amount of cock that you take up your ass. it is only effective (at somewhat hurting one's feelings) if directed at a male with a strong belief in the gender binary.I don't support nigging tumblrtards, I hate jocks, I'm a weak faggot who doesn't lift and I'm still a cis male. Being ``masculine'' is a social construct which forces everyone without a brain to be the biggest drooling retard who can throw an egg-shaped ball the farthest, not related to your sexual identity or whatever the fuck you gaylords are babbling abound.
Being ``masculine'' is a social construct which forces everyone without a brain to be the biggest drooling retard who can throw an egg-shaped ball the farthestAmericunt detected. Masculinity is all about who can best score points in the divine game of football (or as you degenerate fuckers call it, ``soccer'').
I'm still a cis male.No, you're a beta faggot. The only reason you're alive is because nobody bothers to end your sorry life.
You (and the tumblr gaylords) are wrong if you think having a dick has to do anything with fulfilling societal expectations. You could be a male who likes cutting hair and painting girls' nails, you still have a dick and you're a male. You could be a nigger jock who craves for dicks and plays football. You are still a male. I don't care about all that gender crap, being masculine is a cultural convention and it doesn't have anything to do with your having a dick and whatever the Social Jew Warriors are trying to push.The paragraph lacks a point. Well, aside from illustrating your ignorance and antisemitism.
I do acknowledge the existence of those with gender dysphoria, but at the very least they should acknowledge their condition as a mental illness. They deserve the same respect any other person with a mental disorder does, but they shouldn't shove their condition down their throats.I acknowledge your retardation as a mental illness.
I'm not as radical as ey-kun to ignore gender altogether because you faggots are arguing over social conventions, not over dicks and cunts.I don't ignore it, I actively reject and hate it.
If you're arguing over social conventions being stupid then fine, but please don't bring your otherkin transethnic bullshit to the mix.That's part of the reason I hate gender (and identity politics in general).
It is possible to not be masculine and not be an underaged tumblrtard at the same time.Underaged tumblrtards usually uphold gender as a defining trait of an individual; they seem to want a bit more choice over which gender, but they don't see anything wrong with gender itself or identity politics. The herd mentality is astounding.
No, you're a beta faggot. The only reason you're alive is because nobody bothers to end your sorry life."Cis male" implies nothing about sexual orientation or personality.