The "profit" is in preventing the child sexual abuse inherent in the production of CP. Not everything that's outlawed is outlawed because someone gains financial profit from it - for example murder and rape are outlawed because they harm people, not because murder and rape hurt someone's profits.
How can America be a free country, if it outlaws Child Porn, just like Russia, North Korea and China?
Isn't this kind of a "Hitler ate sugar" argument? Russia, NK, and China also have armed forces, a government, and a population. Does that mean any country with one of those things is a totalitarian dictatorship? What sets America apart as a "free country" is that criticism of the government is protected speech, which isn't true in places like North Korea.
CP will probably eventually be legal to possess. Already I've seen 8-11 year olds plenty of them shaking and twerking ass on YouTube, some with at least a million views. The normies bitch about it (but there's more positive comments about desiring these girls), but they also bitched about the homoqueers, the general whores, porn legalization, ect. I've since accepted that it's next to come down the pike.
Love is love, age doesn't matter! The government should not only lift these unjust laws, but it should provide reparations to the poor pedophiles deprived of a means to express their sexuality, as well as damages to the children who could have been earning money through their art. In the future when capitalism is finally dead and buried, we will look back with horror at the humiliation we are currently visiting on our fellow man.
Name:
>>72016-10-03 21:47
Additionally, I would like to humbly propose that the concept of consent should not apply to any trans* or queer person, including children, and any person should be able to have sex with them, at any time, regardly of any objections or concurrences the trans* or queer individual may have. As they are demanding the world recognize their fetish, it is unfair that the world not be able to forcibly impose it's fetishes on them. Such an inequitable exchange is capitalistic in nature and cannot be allowed in a truly egalitarian society. Besides that, to refuse sex just because someone views them as an object to be used up and disposed of is kink-shaming (as is all transphobia and pedophobia and arachnophobia in fact).
The "profit" is in preventing the child sexual abuse inherent in the production of CP.
Then why Hentai and 3d rendered CP are illegal too? Also, for some reason there is no child abuse, when one forces his children against their will to do chores, but when some child agrees for a photo-session, he enjoys, that is child abuse.
Then why Hentai and 3d rendered CP are illegal too?
Hentai just means anime pornography, the term doesn't imply anything pedophilic. Rendered videos would be a problem if they're realistic enough to be indistinguishable from the real thing, as it would require the government to closely monitor the producers to make sure no actual children are being harmed. It requires a lot less resources to just ban anything that looks like CP. Furthermore, the government just doesn't want to do anything that normalizes pedophilia.
Also, for some reason there is no child abuse, when one forces his children against their will to do chores, but when some child agrees for a photo-session, he enjoys, that is child abuse.
Children can't even legally consent to financial transactions, what makes you think they can consent to sex? Children often lack the maturity to properly understand what sex entails, and even if they do, they lack the social power to say no if a parent tries to push them into it. And yes, forcing children to do things against their will is a normal part of parenting, however that's what things like child protective services are for, to make sure the parents aren't actually forcing their children into anything harmful.
Name:
Anonymous2016-10-04 2:31
>>12 Sex isn't special and there isn't anything inherently harmful or bad about it, and there isn't very much that anyone needs to understand about it. It's harmful because it violates social norms and everyone starts telling the children that they have been defiled and their lives are now ruined. For instance, children in our culture would be traumatized if they say someone cut out another person's still-beating heart, but Aztec children were not. If the cultural values surrounding sexuality were different, then they wouldn't be harmed.
That said, there is also nothing beneficial to sex with kids for them, and pedophiles are a tiny minority who don't need to be catered too, so there isn't really any need to change anything except how "victims" are created. As society becomes more tolerant of teenage and child sexuality, and moralizing busybody women who run stupid charities because they have nothing better to do die off, it will probably become normalized in a few hundred years time as people simply stop caring.
>>13 Sex is inherently powerful: it has a strong effect on the mind and the body. It has healing powers that heal the mind and body. However when it is abused, sex will destroy the mind and can also destroy the body.
The thing about sex with children is that it is extremely hard for the people to gauge how much damage is being done, assuming that there is damage happening. The child won't understand the meaning and consequence of what's happening and they certainly cannot explain in what ways they're being hurt - the best explanation they can give is along the lines of "my peepee hurts when you touch it". You cannot normalize sex with children because children are simply not ready for it: not mentally nor physically.
Pubescents are a different matter. Pubescent people have a greater consciousness about what's happening. They will have experiences, knowledge and reasoning abilities that can support the meaning and consequence of sexual activity. Pubescent bodies are more accommodating to sexual activity even if it isn't quite mature. None of this is true for children.
>>23 A surprising amount are actually far right or Nazis. Many resent the LBFAGT groups for throwing us under the bus and outright hate feminists and the Marxist garbage that calls us the oppressors. Still a minority, most just want to be left alone, but more than left-aligned pedos.
I'm not sure what the boy pedos think or what the deepweb pedos think though, the former speak in incomprehensible gibberish and the later are almost invariably barely literate retards and I haven't been involved in that crowd since I was in my teens.
>>26 I didn't say all, I said a surprising amount, and I excluded boy pedos from that.
>>26,27 NAMBLA always insisted they were pederasts, not pedophiles. The difference is lost on me though. Anyway, they have been little more than a static website for over a decade now. I'd guess that, like the KKK or US Socialist Party, 95% of their members are FBI agents.
>>28 No, I don't have the emotional energy to feel much of anything anymore, much less get involved in a political ideology that requires so much activity. I'm just waiting to die.
Name:
Anonymous2016-10-06 17:18
>>31 Why are you waiting to die? It sounds like you ate depressed. Man up, Pedo-kun, no one likes a crybaby.
Name:
Anonymous2016-10-06 17:37
>>30 Yeah that's a nice spin. People should start a "Stop the hate" pro-pedo campaign. I'm surprised the lefties still haven't done something like this. Stop the prejudice! LOL
>>33 You seem to be forgetting the fact that leftists are opposed to rape in all of its forms.
Name:
Anonymous2016-10-06 21:01
>>35 But pedos also push the argument that it is consenting. Also leftists are encouraging children to question their sexuality before puberty.
Name:
Anonymous2016-10-06 21:16
Leftists don't want to legalize pedophilia, that would be antifeminist. It will never be allowed for a man and a girl, only men and boys, women and either, or shitskins and white children. It isn't about sex for them, it is about degrading straight white men.
Name:
Anonymous2016-10-06 21:38
>>35 Except when they apologize to their rapists because they don't want to be racist.