Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

Youtube Censorship

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-13 15:06

https://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/youtube/wZ_bdv42HyY
And none of these censored comments were insulting or breaking ToS, people were just stating their political opinion in a thoughtful manner. Non political comments are not censured.

"zion2012 said:
Youtube censorship has begun, we are no longer in control of content."

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-13 15:07

The discussion itself was censured:
https://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/youtube/JdPAzgskcHU

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-13 17:20

censured != censored

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-13 17:53

>>3

thank you, grammar Nazi.

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-13 21:45

Who cares? If they don't like your speech, then take it elsewhere. Nobody has to host your speech for you.

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-13 22:24

>>5

Where should I take my child porn speech then?

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-14 0:19

>>6
Buy a server in Africa, call it Liberiachan.

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-14 4:22

>>5
so we don't actually have freedom of speech at all

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-14 9:55

If you like freedom so much, why not move to Somalia?

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-14 12:27

Freedom is for faggots who are to weak to survive fascism.

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-14 18:40

My Channel Was Censured by Russian Nazis
https://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/youtube/XPSizuS-_s4

Hi! I'm Nikita Sadkov, a well known in anti-Russian activist here in Russia and a proud russophobe.

Generally my videos are made to test free speech and offend Russians, so they were reported by butthurt Russians. I haven't broke any ToS, but, unfortunately, Youtube employs Russians as moderators for Russian segment, and of course they blocked my channel and refuse any appellations, so now I get "You are currently not allowed to upload." It is very bad idea to hire russians as moderators, because all Russians are very biased by definition of being "Russian"

While citizen of Russia, I don't consider myself Russian and I hate Russia, so I try to protest at least on the Internet, but still get censured. What should I do to unblock my channel and defend myself against Russian censorship?

Sincerely,
Nikita Sadkov

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-15 11:30

>>8
Freedom of speech doesn't imply that society has to host your speech for your behalf. You are delusional to think that free speech means everything you say in public means you will see no negative consequences from what you've said. The only thing it means is that the government won't arrest you for speaking such things.

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-15 12:56

>>12
Nice, I salute you sir

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-16 6:35

>>12
Fucking anti free speech scum

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-17 6:09

>>11
You're a spammer. You shouldn't be misrepresenting your videos.

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-17 15:33

>>15
You're a retard. You shouldn't be misrepresenting your IQ.

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-18 15:35

Youtube also practices hellbanning (https://blog.codinghorror.com/suspension-ban-or-hellban/):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G5RdzLTxO5I

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-18 15:42

>>17
Hellbanning is just a part of Google's "don't be evil" policy. Because it would be evil to directly notify user that he is banned without any reason.

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-18 15:42

>>18

http://knowyourmeme.com/forums/general/topics/27408-google-is-secretly-shadow-banning-innocent-people-from-commenting-on-youtube-ghosting

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-18 23:32

Youtube moderators are underage kids:
http://www.infowars.com/youtube-to-fight-trolls-by-hiring-army-of-trolls-to-delete-videos-they-disagree-with/

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-19 1:14

>>20
infowars
get a real source

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-19 2:35

>>21
check my real dubs

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-19 2:44

>>22
22
get a real dubs

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-19 13:56

>>21

"I shall never be ashamed of citing a bad author if the line is good." - Lucius Annaeus Seneca

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-20 0:27

>>24
He is talking about how the author wrote the line, not what he wrote. Essentially, even if in almost every other regard the writer is bad, if he manages to write a good line that sounds pretty swell, then Seneca will cite it. Infowars is still shit.

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-20 1:03

>>25
No, he is talking about truth. He is defining truth as good and lies as bad.

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-20 1:44

>>26
He seems to have forgotten that only a Sith deals in absolutes.

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-20 2:22

>>27
Only a white woman would claim that truth and lies are a subjective grey area. So let me ask you this: are you literally a white woman?

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-20 4:52

where do we go then?

anyone know a good mediagoblin instance?

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-20 4:52

or some kind of IPFS tube?

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-20 11:10

>>28
Define ``literally".

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-20 21:00

>>30
http://gateway.glop.me/ipfs/QmY7KEmJKpx7bNDQ2WfDJp2zdsvX1ATZKWd4AXAhDLCaBM

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-22 19:18

check'em

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-23 4:27

>>31
Define why u use the faggot quote?

Name: Anonymous 2016-11-09 1:14

>>30
the geyser of shit that is youtube (or google in general) is impossible to contain via altruism. ballpark +1PB of data a day.

open platform would be having federated youtube, where anyone can host the video in place of their choice (open market of niggerkikes who compete to spam your video with least amount of ads while paying you the most). only then they'd have at least vague over content - by having choice of landlord.

Name: Anonymous 2017-09-29 23:52

It's gotten worse. Now they outright delete videos or put them in a "limited state" and demonetize whole channels.

Name: Anonymous 2017-09-30 21:51

>>35
>spam your video with least amount of ads while paying you the most
Ad-supported internet is a big fail. What we need is a system where you pay like $10 a month and then get to split that between all the videos and articles you engage with (minus like $1 to whoever is administrating the system).

Maybe the first video or article is free and then you get to decide if you want to put them on the list of people you pay. If you watch/read 300 pieces of content a month that is 0.02c per view, or a $20 CPM for the creator. Brave Browser is going in that direction with btc micro payments, but it needs to be a cooperative effort across many channels and not btc based.

Name: Anonymous 2017-09-30 22:28

Ad-supported internet is a big fail.
So that's why GOOGL is only #2 in market cap.

Name: Anonymous 2017-09-30 23:53

>>38
oooooh woooow market cap?! ooooooooh. meanwhile, ads ruin the browsing experience and require huge invasions of privacy to turn even the most meager of profits. But who cares, as long as some kikes have a high "market cap" and provide spy tools for the CIA, right? That is what is truly important and doing away with ad-supported internet would be a bad thing.

Name: Anonymous 2017-10-01 0:12

>>39
I didn't say it was good, but calling billions of dollars ``meager'' seems disingenuous at best.

Name: Anonymous 2017-10-01 0:31

>>40
Billions spent on online advertising is not the same as billions in profit. But you seem to think that online advertising is a successful model because joogle supposedly has billions in profit (actually government funding), ignoring the fact that barely any profit is made by advertisers and site owners and the ad-model has totally ruined the internet. Stop being a retard.

Name: Anonymous 2017-10-01 13:34

Stop being a retard.
IQ doesn't change that much over a person's lifetime.

Name: Anonymous 2017-10-02 0:24

>>42
IQ is a white devil invention
It doesn't mean shit

Name: Anonymous 2017-10-02 2:29

>>42
IQ is culturally biased.

Name: Anonymous 2017-10-02 6:54

>>43
white devil
How the hell did a crypto-Marxist BLM dindu such as yourself find this place?

>>44
As compared to what exactly?

Name: Anonymous 2017-10-02 10:12

>>45
He's probably one of the anti-fa refugees from 4x13 textboard.

Name: Anonymous 2017-10-02 12:05

>>46
4x13 only had one actual poster

Name: Anonymous 2017-10-02 12:17

>>44
That doesn't matter, it's still a successful predictive measure.

Name: Anonymous 2017-10-02 12:29

>>45
How the hell did a crypto-Marxist BLM dindu such as yourself find this place?
it's good for diversity purposes to fill the diversity quota

Name: Anonymous 2017-10-02 14:31

>>49
Well played.

Name: Anonymous 2017-10-02 20:42

IQ isn't reliable.

Name: Anonymous 2017-10-12 8:04

Google need to be broken up, same with Microsoft. Too bad that we can't trust the government to actually do something like that.

Name: Anonymous 2017-10-12 8:07

>>52
we can't trust the government to actually do something like that.
That's why they shouldn't break them up either. The government shouldn't interfere with private businesses.

Name: Anonymous 2017-10-12 8:34

>>53
Google and Microsoft are essentially part of the US government. Your statement is childish because you live in a pretend game of freedom. There is no such thing as private anything, the government either allows you to pretend to own/run it or they take it from you. It doesn't matter what the government "shouldn't" do, they do what they want because they own you.

Name: Anonymous 2017-10-12 8:45

>>54
There is no such thing as private anything
Stopped reading there. Cool story, commie.

Name: Anonymous 2017-10-12 8:49

>>55
>Stopped reading there
Of course, because you live in a make-believe fantasy.

Name: Anonymous 2017-10-12 9:50

When youtube deleted videos for including copyrighted music, AMV makers moved to obscure sites(e.g. chinese/russian video hosting). There are always alternatives.

Name: Anonymous 2017-10-12 16:19

>>55
He's right in a way, when you get right down to it, our "capitalist" countries are communist just with much freer markets.

Name: Anonymous 2017-10-13 2:02

>>53
The last time that the US Government legitimately broke up a monopoly was Standard Oil which was well over 100 years ago and government intervention paradoxically made markets more free. Of course that was a time when government was a much more trustworthy entity. Today I trust neither government nor multinational corporations.

Name: Anonymous 2017-10-13 6:24

I gonvernemnt-imposed break up doesn't fix the root of the issue. America's quisi-duopolous ISP's are a testament to that.

Name: Anonymous 2017-10-13 6:31

>>60
It would if it were made in the interest of making a more competitive market and not using regulations in an inverted manner which creates artificial barriers to entry. Fat chance of that ever being corrected, though.
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode + RSS -