Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

How I interview candidates

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-09 3:49

I call it the peeing test: I go to the bathroom with the candidate and then kindly ask:
Alright, so now I would like to see some urination :) Okey?
Come on... Don't you know how to pee? Is not that hard... haha
Oh there you go :) a drop of urine. Don't worry, take your time :)
If things go well I may also ask for a small poop, just to see how far they can go.

And this is how I know if the candidate is a real human.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-09 4:13

more like this, please

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-09 12:09

this is supposed to be satire but they actually do this

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-09 12:25

>>3
this is supposed to be satire but they actually do this

>>1 is from Russia, filtering out nonhuman job applicants is a matter of survival there. And no, they drink vodka like nobody's business so you can't use that, if that's what you were probably wondering about.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-09 13:55

I just say let's see some action then we have sex

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-09 13:57

have you ever thought about how gay a lot of modern programming stuff is, like why get all fucking complicated. it's all old. it's all been done. fuck being super smart. it's like the best programs are the ones where you're saying: I woke up, got dressed, went outside, and then I was outside.

it's not like you need to win the fucking 'best story of the year' award

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-09 14:05

and cudder's still micro optimising his shit in ass-embly hahhaha

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-09 21:26

>>3
drug testing is only practiced in third-world countries

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-10 14:28

This thread is biological in nature.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-11 9:15

CHICKENS ARE GLOBAL GLOBAL GLOBAL GLOBAL GLOBAL

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-11 9:26

CHECK `EM

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-11 9:29

CHECK THIS BITCH

*THROWS A CHESS SET AT YOU*

Name: Cudder !pL69Yeq2J6 2015-06-11 12:47

(define (PICKYOURWEAPON lst atoms)
(list-ref (map (lambda (x) (list x x atoms)) lst) (- (length lst) 1)))

(define (CUTMYSANDWICHBITCH lst)
(define (take lst n)
(if (zero? n)
'()
(cons (car lst) (take (cdr lst) (- n 1)))))

(cons (take lst (quotient (length lst) 2))
(list-tail lst (quotient (length lst) 2))))

(define (ANDTAKETHECRUSTOFFYOUSTUPIDBITCH lst) (cdr lst))

(define (HOWCOMEYOUCANTDOASIMPLETASKYOUSPENDALLDAYINTHEFUCKINGKITCHENN) '(doodoo
doo))

(print (PICKYOURWEAPON (ANDTAKETHECRUSTOFFYOUSTUPIDBITCH (CUTMYSANDWICHBITCH '(L
ASERSWORD DIAPERGUN ROBOTSABER))) 'THEFORCE))
(print (HOWCOMEYOUCANTDOASIMPLETASKYOUSPENDALLDAYINTHEFUCKINGKITCHENN))

Name: Cudder !MhMRSATORI 2015-06-11 12:50

Ignore >>13, please. Scheme was a mistake. I suck cocks BTW.

Name: Cudder !pL69Yeq2J6 2015-06-11 13:13

<TAB>ADD EAX, 2
<TAB>MOV EBX, EAX
<TAB>OH WHO THE FUCK CAN BE BOTHERED WRITING THIS STUPID SHIT ... OH WAIT, I CAN, BECAUSE I'M RETARDED

Name: Firefox considered adware 2015-06-11 13:42

>>13
>>14
>>15
if you could just fuck off? that'd be great

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-11 13:55

>>16
Considered an armful!

Name: The Optimiser 2015-06-11 15:57

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-11 16:11

>>18
I love your posts.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-12 16:24

i'm probably lonely here, having owned a software company and hired about 20 programmers myself. Submitting their own work was always required and for the interview I'd just spot a bug in their own code and ask what's wrong with it.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-12 16:51

>>20
Are you a Jew?

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-12 16:54

no, a finn but i don't care about that.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-12 16:55

>>22
Then the Jews have put you out of competition and/or bought your company, am I right?

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-12 17:00

>>23
Essentially the banks did due to currency rates, totally unexpected and unlikely but it got me a couple of years ago. I had to call quits before it would be to late.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-12 17:02

Submitting their own work was always required
Their own work from what? Prior companies? Their own time? You have no right to see either.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-12 17:02

>>24
So, the fractional banking system. Which is mostly owned by Jews. And the system of currency trading, which is what the first Rothschild used to get rich and oppress goys. Thanks for the data point.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-12 17:04

Jew did it again!

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-12 17:17

>>25
From own work, yes. I don't see why I wouldn't have the right to see what someone would like to display.
>>26
It was related to the economical crash yes, of course it might not have been a problem for a good business man if that has any meaning.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-12 17:34

DEFINITION of 'Fractional Reserve Banking'

A banking system in which only a fraction of bank deposits are backed by actual cash-on-hand and are available for withdrawal. This is done to expand the economy by freeing up capital that can be loaned out to other parties. Most countries operate under this type of system.

http://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/fractionalreservebanking.asp

So most of the money banks lend is money they don't even have. But how much will they lend? How much will they "expand the economy"? By however much they want. They can expand the economy, contract it, they can conspire to do it in sync. You don't have a say, you're just a "bad businessman" and they are the gods of money and debt. They can create economic booms simply by increasing liquidity, and they can create economic crises simply by decreasing it. 1929 was not different in principle from 2008. Once a small trans-national cabal controls your money, you can expect your economy to crash and lives to be lost, again and again and again.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-12 18:15

>>20
Don't tell me that you did whiteboard tests... pls don't

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-12 19:05

>>30
What's wrong with whiteboard tests?

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-12 19:36

>>31
White. White is always wrong.

Name: Sir Checks-a-lot of Dubs 2015-06-12 20:44

Dubs. Dubs are always right.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-12 23:33

>>31
white-boards are a symbol of oppression: think about it

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List