I'm used to jews being in all the subversive parts of society (banking, leftist politics, etc.) but CLISP and Scheme both seem really nice to me, especially Scheme. However McCarthy was a Jew, Sussman was, Abelson was, CLISP boots to a fucking menorah, and some popular schemes are jewish (Winkelmann's CHICKEN-Scheme comes to mind).
What the fuck is going on?
Name:
Anonymous2016-03-24 21:23
Jews are smarter than goyim.
Name:
Anonymous2016-03-24 21:25
You'd expect lisp to be somewhat of a scourge on the programming community though. Or are these tools by the jew for the jew, and am I the goy meddling in the master's cabal?
Name:
Anonymous2016-03-24 21:33
Ask yourself, have you done anything meaningful with lisp?
Jews are playing their classic subversive role, lisp is a drug for programmers.
Name:
Anonymous2016-03-24 21:35
I haven't, but then again I haven't done anything meaningful with any language.
Name:
Anonymous2016-03-24 22:28
Lisp is like Judaism - a lot of limitations, akin to shabbat or kosher. You can't use say for-loop, and have to go the tricky way of recursion. Immutability of data structures is even more religious idea, than the recursion y-combinator hell.
Name:
Anonymous2016-03-24 22:39
>>6 but that's just regular functional programming, so is Haskell part of this too?
>>6 Common Lisp can loop all day without recursion, all data structures are mutable (though mutating things like linked list nodes can be a really stupid idea).
Scheme is shit and can't loop. Not sure about its immutable structures, though I suspect it doesn't have a Haskell-boner either.
Name:
Anonymous2016-03-24 23:14
>>1 Jews go to where the money is. Lisp in its heyday was a massive money target for government AI and defense funding. Then the fucking tard segment of AI caused Lisp to be collateral damage when their shitty fake-ass claims popped.
Name:
Anonymous2016-03-25 1:02
>>10 It's easy to say that it was all garbage now, but without them chugging through all that garbage, we wouldn't be able to see how hard it is now.
Name:
Anonymous2016-03-25 1:08
>>11 I'm not talking about the research stuff. I'm talking about the business claims that were made by """AI""" project runners to suckle on the government teat.
LISP is the typical Jew language. It's used by academics to demonstrate their abstract bullshite theories and never to accomplish anything in the real word.
C is the Aryan man's language. It was born out of necessity for the purpose of developing the Unix operating system. It's a very pragmatic language.
Why do people who don't know LISP feel the need to comment on it?
Why do they always assume LISP is like Haskell?
Name:
Anonymous2016-03-25 7:46
>>7 Yup. Most Jews are now around Haskell. Lisp is so last century.
Name:
Anonymous2016-03-25 11:58
The goyim code in C-like languages. Lisp is from jews for jews and not for goyim.
Name:
Anonymous2016-03-25 13:13
Winkelmann is Jewish? Is that confirmed or are you just suggesting that German name = hymie name?
Name:
Anonymous2016-03-25 13:23
Haskell and Yesod are Jewish too.
Name:
Anonymous2016-03-25 13:38
20 yeah that might've been an overstatement, I'm not sure if he is; anyways the point still stands even without winkelmann
Name:
Anonymous2016-03-25 15:04
I don't think if there was anything malicious about it they would themselves use it. Maybe some of them believe their own bullshit; that sharing is really the way to go
I don't think if there was anything malicious about it they would themselves use it.
But that's the kicker: they don't use it themselves, they teach goyim how to use it (and get paid for it), who then try and still fail to produce any useful software with it.
Isn't the lack of good Lisp software just because not a lot of people use it? I wasn't even born at the time but from what I've heard and read Lisp used to be the shit, and was used pretty much independently of race and ideology.
I've done some lisp and a lot of other languages too. The only problem I had with lisp is a lack of good libraries for many things. I usually try to make some simple games because I enjoy it, and everything non text-based was crappy in lisp (at least scheme) because I was lacking good graphics libraries. Aside from that Lisp was nicer to work with than many other languages.
Name:
Anonymous2016-03-25 22:17
Every language outside C, C++, Java, and C# have the "Lol, but no """useful""" software! failz!" bullshit spew directed at it. Then you point out major software installations using them, and the only response is "just one? roflcopter pointless".
People like >>24 are simply broken ingoramuses who are destined to become tomorrow's old disconnected Cobol farts.
Name:
Anonymous2016-03-25 22:49
>>26 Point out some major software installations running Lisp. The only one I can think of is Emacs. That's the only use I can think for it outside of academia.
Name:
Anonymous2016-03-25 23:08
>>27 Being used mainly by academia doesn't have to be bad though; I enjoy doing some Haskell now and then for example. You need to keep the fun in programming. Also, as long as it's used in academia for some actual quality research, I would see this as a good thing too.
The questions for me are rather: Will the programmer who spends major amounts of time on Lisp regret this in the end, having wasted his time? Will doing Lisp indeed make you a better programmer as often claimed? For those niche fields where Lisp is nice, would it be better to move on to languages like Haskell or is Lisp still the way to go? Was Lisp just created to screw the goyim over and make them hallucinate about parentheses?
>>28 I certainly don't regret learning Lisp. I would be more than happy to use it if it had better implementations. I do miss some of its features when using other languages, particularly homoiconic syntax. Emacs is awful although I still use it all the time. It goes to show how much there is to improve.
Name:
Anonymous2016-03-26 2:54
>>27 Lisp did have a heyday where massive multi-million dollar projects were done in it, to the point there was an ecosystem of hardware manufacturers to support the language even better.
Nowadays, yes there's Emacs and AutoCAD, but I'm privy to quite a few massive security installations authored in Common Lisp. There are tons of job postings for Clojure (arguably a Lisp) from companies building projects and websites.
Lisp has a completely nonindicative marketing stigma attached to it, and people don't advertise the Lisp back ends in their work.
